Fossil Evidence: Types, Records, and Limitations
I. Introduction
The detailed study of fossils is important in paleontology, acting as a key way to see the biological variety and ecological changes of Earth’s history. Fossils, which are the preserved remains or signs of past living things, come in different types, each giving special insights into evolutionary paths, environmental conditions, and extinction events. Looking into these fossil types, together with their geological settings, helps build a better understanding of how life developed over time. However, the fossil record is not complete and has many limitations, affected by things like preservation bias, geological changes, and the right conditions needed to form fossils. Thus, carefully analyzing fossil evidence shows not only the richness of past biodiversity but also the difficulties researchers face in creating accurate stories about ancient life. This essay will clarify the complicated issues related to fossil evidence, its categories, and the limitations that impact our knowledge of Earth’s biological history.
A. Definition of fossil evidence and its significance in paleontology
Fossil proof is important in paleontology. It includes the preserved remains, marks, or impressions of old living things that were around in geological history. This proof gives information about the shape and actions of extinct creatures and helps us understand how evolution happened and what the environment was like in the past. For example, fossils found at Agate Fossil Beds National Monument show important details about the evolution of mammals in North America during the Miocene Epoch. This helps to explain changes in species and ecological interactions (Smet D et al.). Also, it is important to know the difference between body fossils and trace fossils. Trace fossils, in particular, provide special insights into how ancient creatures behaved, showing how they interacted with changes in their environment (Meek et al.). This shows why fossil evidence is needed to piece together the complicated story of life on Earth, helping both research and educational efforts in paleontology.
| Type | Definition | Significance |
| Body Fossils | Remains of the actual organism, such as bones, teeth, and shells. | Provide direct evidence of the physical attributes of organisms and help reconstruct past environments. |
| Trace Fossils | Evidence of the activity of organisms, such as footprints, burrows, and feces. | Offer insights into behavior, movement, and ecological interactions of past life. |
| Chemical Fossils | Organic compounds or isotopic signatures left by organisms. | Help in identifying ancient life forms and understanding their biochemical processes. |
| Microfossils | Very small fossilized remains, usually of microscopic organisms. | Important for studying ancient marine environments and paleoclimatology. |
| Biosignatures | Indicators of life, often in the form of fossilized organic molecules. | Help in detecting past life on Earth and potentially other planets. |
Fossil Evidence Types and Their Significance
B. Overview of the essay’s structure and main themes
The essay has a clear layout that leads the reader through the different parts of fossil evidence, covering its types, records, and limitations. The introduction first shows the importance of fossils in figuring out evolutionary history and geological time. The next sections explore various fossil types, explaining ideas like body and trace fossils, and stressing their separate functions in piecing together past ecosystems. The talk about paleontological records points out important findings, such as those from Agate Fossil Beds National Monument, which show their role in North American mammal evolution (Smet D et al.). Additionally, the essay looks at the limits that come with fossilization and interpretation, using various approaches to improve understanding (Bolt et al.). By going through these topics step by step, the essay not only sheds light on the complex link between fossil evidence and biological history but also prompts deeper thought about current research issues.
II. Types of Fossils
Fossils can be grouped into a few main types, each showing different parts of past life and environmental situations. Preserved remains, like those found in amber, show full specimens that give us information about the form of extinct organisms. Trace fossils, such as footprints and burrows, show behaviors from long ago. Mold and cast fossils show the original shape of an organism, helping in the study of body structures that have disappeared over time. Also, petrified fossils, where organic matter is changed into minerals, can show details about the organisms’ biochemical processes. These different types of fossils are important for scientists who are figuring out historical biogeography and understanding evolution changes. For example, combining fossil pollen data with species distribution models has helped clarify where Abies species lived during major climate changes. This shows how fossil records connect with ecological niches, as noted by the research of Alba-Sánchez et al. (Benito de Pando et al.). But, as pointed out by advances in technology, our understanding of these fossil types is limited by how we interpret them, which affects our view of geological history (Baker et al.).
| Type | Description | Examples | Significance |
| Body Fossils | Actual remains of an organism, such as bones, teeth, and shells. | Dinosaur bones, fossilized shells | Provide direct evidence of ancient life forms. |
| Trace Fossils | Indirect evidence of organism activity, such as footprints, burrows, and feces. | Dinosaur footprints, coprolites | Offer insights into behavior and movement of ancient organisms. |
| Chemical Fossils | Molecular remains or biomarkers indicating the presence of past life. | Cholesterol from ancient sponges | Help in identifying the types of organisms that existed and their metabolic processes. |
| Composite Fossils | Fossils formed from multiple organisms or components. | Coral reefs made from multiple coral species | Demonstrate complex ecosystems and interrelationships between species. |
| Mold and Cast Fossils | Imprints or casts of an organism, where the original material has been replaced or left a mold. | Shell molds, ammonite casts | Reveal details of the organism’s shape and structure. |
Types of Fossils
A. Body fossils and their role in understanding ancient life forms
Body fossils play important role in helping us understand ancient life forms. They give us direct information about how these organisms looked, acted, and interacted with their environment. By studying these fossils, scientists can piece together essential parts of an organism’s structure, like how ammonoids, specifically heteromorphs, stayed buoyant—information that is highlighted in current research combining phylogenetic and palaeobiological data (R Hoffmann et al.). Additionally, looking at where fossils are found and how many there are helps scientists to figure out evolutionary trends and how species adapted to their environments over long time periods. This complex relationship also includes methods that combine fossil information with genetic studies, leading to a better grasp of how species interact and respond to climate changes (Lynn L Anderson-Carpenter et al.). Still, it is important to be aware of the limits of body fossils, especially concerning how they are preserved and the risks of misreading data, emphasizing the importance of careful and thorough methods in paleontological studies.
| Fossil Type | Period | Location Found | Significance |
| Ammonite | Jurassic | Montana, USA | Provides insights into marine ecosystems and evolution of cephalopods. |
| Tyrannosaurus rex | Late Cretaceous | South Dakota, USA | Helps understand theropod evolution and predatory behaviors. |
| Trilobite | Cambrian | Pennsylvania, USA | Offers evidence of early arthropod diversity and paleoenvironmental conditions. |
| Mammoth | Pleistocene | Siberia, Russia | Provides data on Pleistocene fauna and climate change effects. |
| Dinosaur eggs | Late Cretaceous | China | Shows reproductive behaviors and development of dinosaurs. |
Body Fossils and Their Significance in Understanding Ancient Life Forms
B. Trace fossils and what they reveal about behavior and environment
Discovering what trace fossils mean helps us learn about how ancient organisms acted and the conditions they lived in. These structures made by living things, like burrows and signs of feeding, give us information about the behavior of larger bottom-dwelling communities, especially as their habitats changed. For example, studies done at the Ocean Discovery Program (ODP) Site 977 show changes in the variety of traces and degrees of bioturbation during key shifts in ancient environments, like Termination V and MIS 11. The research finds that the availability of oxygen and how much organic matter was produced at the surface greatly affected the community of those making the traces. This shows a clear connection between the behavior of living things and environmental conditions, especially during moments of high organic deposits and low bioturbation (Dorador et al.). Such patterns provide paleontologists with insights about ancient ecosystems and how organisms adapted within them, stressing the importance of studying trace fossils to piece together past land and ocean environments (Rodr Díguez et al.).
| Type of Trace Fossil | Species | Location | Age (Million Years Ago) | Environment | Behavioral Insight |
| Footprints | Theropod Dinosaurs | La Rioja, Argentina | 100 | Terrestrial | Predatory movement patterns |
| Burrows | Early Amphibians | Nova Scotia, Canada | 370 | Coastal wetlands | Burrowing behavior for moisture retention |
| Coprolites (Fossilized dung) | Tyrannosaurus rex | Montana, USA | 66 | Fluvial | Dietary habits and ecosystem interactions |
| Root traces | Ancient trees | Greenland | 300 | Swampy forest | Plant community dynamics and soil conditions |
| Trackways | Sauropod Dinosaurs | New Mexico, USA | 150 | Floodplains | Herd movement and migration patterns |
Trace Fossil Data
III. Fossil Records
The examination of fossil records is very important for understanding the history of life on Earth, but it has its own limitations. Fossils often show a biased view of past life, mainly highlighting organisms with hard parts like bones and shells, which skews the data towards certain species and overlooks those with softer bodies. Moreover, the gaps in space and time within fossil records can lead to significant information loss, making it harder to understand ecological and evolutionary trends. Tools like species distribution models (SDMs) have become essential for piecing together past biodiversity patterns, as shown by Alba-Sánchez et al. (2010), but these tools depend heavily on the quality of the current fossil data and how well it is included in these models (Benito de Pando et al.). Therefore, even though fossil evidence is very useful for rebuilding ancient ecosystems, researchers need to be aware of the limitations described by (Baker et al.), which include tech issues and biases from the fossilization process.
| Type of Fossil | Description | Examples | Age Range (Million Years) |
| Body Fossils | Preserved remains of the organism itself, such as bones, teeth, and shells. | Dinosaur bones, Mammoth tusks | 0 – 650 |
| Trace Fossils | Evidence of the activities of organisms, such as footprints, burrows, and feces (coprolites). | Dinosaur footprints, worm burrows | 0 – 650 |
| Molecular Fossils | Organic compounds that provide evidence of past life, often extracted from sedimentary rocks. | Steranes, hopanes | 0 – 300 |
| Microfossils | Fossils that are smaller than 1mm, often used for dating and environmental reconstructions. | Foraminifera, pollen grains | 0 – 300 |
| Pseudofossils | Structures or marks that resemble fossils but are of non-biological origin. | Concretions, mineral formations | Varies |
Fossil Records Overview
A. The geological time scale and its importance in fossil dating
The geological time scale is important for knowing Earth’s history and when fossils are from, making fossil dating better. It helps paleontologists place fossils in certain time periods, which helps them piece together evolution and changes over long times. But research shows that using fossil records has problems; there are often differences between fossil records and molecular phylogenies, leading to different views on macroevolutionary trends (Bapst et al.). These issues highlight the need to combine molecular data with fossil information for a complete view of past life. Also, new ideas about how space-related events affect mass extinctions and climate change make fossil dating more complicated, indicating that outside factors should also be part of the geological time framework (Bailer-Jones et al.). Therefore, the geological time scale is essential but also complicated in fossil studies.
The chart illustrates the significance of various geological time periods, showcasing the length of their descriptions as a measure of their importance. The Cenozoic period has the longest description, followed by the Mesozoic, Paleozoic, and finally the Precambrian period. This visual highlights the foundational roles these periods play in understanding life’s evolution and biodiversity over time.
B. Methods of fossil preservation and their impact on the quality of records
The ways fossils are preserved affect the quality and trustworthiness of paleontological records, which helps us understand ancient life and their habitats. Certain conditions are needed for better fossil quality, like fast burial and low oxygen, as they reduce the chance of microbial and environmental damage. For example, fossils from lagerstätten provide important insights into past environments, but determining if these records show the original conditions or changes after burial is difficult. This is evident in studies of Metasequoia, where changes in shape and structure were noted during diagenesis (Witkowski et al.). Additionally, differences between fossil data and molecular findings make it hard to interpret evolutionary history, revealing the limitations and biases within the fossil record (Bapst et al.). Therefore, grasping the details of preservation methods is important to evaluate the reliability of fossil evidence and its role in understanding past ecosystems.
| Method | Description | Impact on Quality | Example |
| Permineralization | Minerals fill the spaces within organic tissue. | High; details of cellular structure are often preserved. | Fossilized wood. |
| Mold and Cast | Molds form in sediment, and casts are created by filling the mold with material. | Moderate; external details are preserved but not internal structures. | Shells and imprints of leaves. |
| Amber Preservation | Organisms are trapped in tree resin that hardens into amber. | Very high; exceptional preservation of soft tissues. | Insects and small vertebrates. |
| Freezing | Preservation in ice or permafrost. | High; can preserve soft tissues. | Woolly mammoths. |
| Desiccation | Rapid drying of organic materials. | Moderate; preservation of skeletal remains. | Preserved prehistoric animal remains in dry caves. |
| Recrystallization | Minerals present in fossils change to more stable forms. | Variable; details may be lost during the process. | Some types of mollusk shells. |
Methods of Fossil Preservation and Their Impact
IV. Limitations of Fossil Evidence
Fossil evidence is very important for understanding past life forms and ecosystems, but it has clear limits. One big issue is the incomplete geological record, which creates gaps in our knowledge of how evolution happened. An example is Romer’s Gap, a critical time with few terrestrial vertebrate fossils, making it hard to get a full picture of vertebrate evolution in the Devonian period and showing a big lack of data for that time (Benito de Pando et al.). Additionally, the technology we use to document and study fossils can affect our interpretations, as discussed in the field of geoscience and information technology (Baker et al.). This dependence on current methods can distort our view of ancient biodiversity, showing that we need better ways to analyze fossils that use a variety of data types to help overcome these issues.
| Limitation | Description | Examples | Source |
| Incompleteness of the Fossil Record | Fossilization is a rare event and only a small percentage of organisms become fossils, leading to gaps in the record. | Dinosaurs are well-represented, but many other species from the same period are missing. | Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History |
| Bias in Fossil Discovery | Certain environments and conditions are more conducive to fossilization, leading to bias toward specific geographical areas or organisms. | Marine fossils are more prevalent due to better preservation conditions compared to terrestrial organisms. | Nature Communications |
| Temporal Resolution | Fossils represent specific time periods, making it difficult to assess evolutionary changes over time. | Fossilized remains may indicate a species existed, but not the duration of its existence. | Paleobiology Database |
| Interpretation Challenges | Fossils can be interpreted in various ways, leading to differing conclusions about the past. | Distinguishing between behavioral traits and environmental adaptations can be complex. | American Journal of Science |
Limitations of Fossil Evidence
A. Incompleteness of the fossil record and its implications for evolutionary studies
The fossil record is not complete, and this creates big problems for studying evolution. There are often differences between what fossils and molecular data suggest. Recent studies show that the fossil record and current taxon-based phylogenetic analyses provide only a partial view of evolutionary history, which may cause contrasting conclusions about where organisms come from and how they diversify (Bapst et al.). For example, looking at the genus Nitraria, which is adapted to steppes, shows how important fossil evidence is for changing our view of evolutionary timelines. When researchers combined fossil pollen data with DNA sequences, they found that the current Nitraria age is much younger than thought before. This points out how crucial it is to look at both extinct and living taxa when studying evolution (Antonelli et al.). Therefore, the limitations of the fossil record call for a broader method that uses various types of evidence to improve our understanding of macroevolutionary processes.
The chart illustrates various categories related to evolutionary research methods and their significance, displaying the length of descriptions for each category. It emphasizes the differences in detail across fossil evidence types, organism genres, research methods, and implications, highlighting areas requiring comprehensive understanding in evolutionary contexts.
B. Potential biases in fossil discovery and interpretation
Finding and understanding fossils can be affected by different biases that might change how we see ancient life. For example, the types of rock conditions and how easy it is to reach fossil sites can greatly influence which fossils are discovered and studied, leading to a misleading view of past biodiversity. This issue is worsened by the dominance of specific types of organisms, especially larger and tougher ones, which are more likely to be preserved and found, resulting in an incomplete view of ancient environments. Additionally, how fossil evidence is understood can be greatly influenced by popular scientific stories and theories, which might favor some ideas over others. Consequently, researchers could miss other explanations or not test different theories well, reflecting issues noted in discussions about historical sciences (Donoghue et al.) and the effects of Kon-Tiki experiments on projective inferences (Brouwer et al.).
| BiasType | Description | Example | Impact |
| Sampling Bias | Certain environments may be overrepresented in fossil records due to geological processes. | Marine environments yield more fossils than terrestrial ones. | Leads to incomplete understanding of biotic diversity. |
| Temporal Bias | Fossils from specific time periods are more likely to be discovered. | Dinosaur fossils are richly documented, while fossils from other eras may be scarce. | Can skew timelines of evolutionary history. |
| Geographical Bias | Certain locations are more likely to produce fossil finds. | Richer fossil beds found in specific areas (e.g., Hell Creek Formation). | Limits insights into global biodiversity. |
| Researcher Bias | The perspective and preconceptions of researchers may influence excavation and interpretation. | Overemphasis on specific species or traits due to researcher interests. | May mislead conclusions about evolutionary significance. |
| Collection Bias | Factors such as funding and resources can affect which sites are explored. | Well-funded expeditions might prioritize certain regions. | Creates gaps in the fossil record of less funded areas. |
Potential Biases in Fossil Discovery and Interpretation
V. Conclusion
In closing, looking at fossil evidence gives a deep look into the complicated history of life on Earth, but it also shows how much we still do not know. The various kinds of fossils, from actual remains to traces of activity, are important records that show how life has changed over different times in Earth’s history. Still, figuring out what these records mean is often limited by technology and methods, as shown by how human minds can only handle so much paleontological data (Baker et al.). Additionally, the ongoing arguments about whether space events caused extinction show how hard it is to make clear conclusions from fossils, with evidence sometimes having flaws in method (Bailer-Jones et al.). Therefore, even though fossil evidence is key to paleontology, it also reminds us to think critically and keep improving how we study our planet’s history.
A. Summary of key points discussed in the essay
In conclusion, the essay on Fossil Evidence: Types, Records, and Limitations discusses important points in paleontology, focusing on the different types of fossils and their importance in understanding ancient environments. It notes how preserved remains, trace fossils, and several fossil types, like molds and casts, help us learn about biodiversity over geological periods. However, there are challenges in fossil records, including gaps such as Romers Gap, which show difficulties in accurately representing the evolutionary timeline of land vertebrates. This situation is made more complex by environmental issues, as climate change affects species distribution and conservation. By using modern methods like Species Distribution Modelling (SDM), researchers can predict possible dangers to biodiversity while recognizing the limits of existing data in properly evaluating species’ statuses (Baker et al.). Therefore, it is crucial to create effective conservation plans that consider these ecological factors (Taesuk et al.).
| Type | Examples | Significance | Limitations |
| Body Fossils | Teeth, bones, shells | Provides direct evidence of ancient organisms. | May not represent entire organism; preservation bias. |
| Trace Fossils | Footprints, burrows, coprolites | Indicates behavior and movement. | Less direct evidence of the organism. |
| Chemical Fossils | Molecular remnants, isotopic signatures | Offers insights into metabolic processes. | Can be affected by diagenesis. |
| Fossil Record | Layered sedimentary deposits | Chronological framework for life history. | Incomplete and subject to interpretation. |
| Dating Techniques | Radiometric dating, biostratigraphy | Helps establish the age of fossils. | Requires precise conditions; affected by external factors. |
Fossil Evidence Summary Statistics
B. The importance of understanding fossil evidence in the context of evolutionary biology and paleontology
Fossil evidence is very important in studying evolutionary biology and paleontology because it connects us to past life forms and their environments. By looking at fossils, researchers can figure out relationships between species and understand how new species arose, how extinctions happened, and how organisms adapted over long periods. This knowledge deepens our understanding of biodiversity and how ecosystems work, helping scientists see how ancient species interacted with their environments, especially during major events like mass extinctions. Additionally, fossils give us information about how evolution has shaped the diversity we see today, as shown by transitional fossils that depict gradual changes in species. These insights are vital for understanding how environmental changes affect species survival, which is important for conservation efforts now. Therefore, recognizing the importance of fossil evidence helps us build a clear picture of the history of life on Earth and fills in gaps in our knowledge about biological evolution.
| Aspect | Description | Significance | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evolutionary Relationships | Fossils provide direct evidence of ancestral species and their traits. | Helps reconstruct phylogenetic trees and evolutionary lineages. | Transitional fossils like Archaeopteryx link birds to theropod dinosaurs. |
| Morphological Changes | Fossils reveal structural adaptations and modifications over time. | Tracks how species evolved in response to environmental changes. | Changes in horse limb structure reflect adaptation to open grasslands. |
| Temporal Context | Fossils provide a timeline for evolutionary events through radiometric dating and stratigraphy. | Enables understanding of when key evolutionary events occurred. | The Cambrian explosion marks a rapid diversification of life approximately 540 million years ago. |
| Extinction Events | Fossil evidence shows periods of mass extinction and recovery. | Offers insights into the resilience and adaptability of life. | Fossils from the K-T boundary reveal the extinction of dinosaurs and the rise of mammals. |
| Biodiversity Over Time | Fossils document the rise and decline of species diversity across eras. | Helps study patterns of speciation and extinction. | The Permian-Triassic extinction event reduced biodiversity by over 90%. |
| Environmental Interactions | Fossils indicate past ecosystems and environmental conditions. | Reveals how species interacted with their habitats and other organisms. | Fossilized coral reefs show ancient marine environments. |
| Biogeography | Fossils help map the distribution of species over time and space. | Explains how geographical changes influenced evolution and migration. | Fossil records of marsupials show their spread from South America to Australia. |
| Development of Traits | Fossils document the origins and evolution of key traits. | Clarifies how complex features like eyes, wings, or limbs evolved. | Fossil evidence traces the evolution of the vertebrate eye from simple light-sensitive patches. |
| Paleoecology | Fossils provide clues about ancient ecosystems and food webs. | Helps reconstruct past ecological dynamics and species interactions. | Fossils of predators and prey provide evidence of ancient food chains. |
| Cultural and Scientific Understanding | Fossils deepen public and academic appreciation for the history of life on Earth. | Inspires scientific inquiry and enhances understanding of biodiversity and its fragility. | Fossil exhibits in museums educate people about evolution and extinct species. |
This table highlights how fossils play a critical role in deciphering the history of life and advancing our understanding of evolutionary processes and paleontological insights.
REFERENCES
- Baker, Coad, Gilbert, Goodchild, Kent, Kuhn, Laszlo, et al.. “Geoscience after IT: Part J. Human requirements that shape the evolving geoscience information system”. ‘Elsevier BV’, 2000, https://core.ac.uk/download/63411.pdf
- Benito de Pando, B, Linares, JC, López-Merino, L, López-Sáez, et al.. “Past and present potential distribution of the Iberian Abies species: A phytogeographic approach using pollen data and species distribution models”. ‘Wiley’, 2010, https://core.ac.uk/download/20496331.pdf
- De Smet, Jessica, Kottkamp, Scott, Santucci, Vincent L., Stark, et al.. “Agate Fossil Beds National Monument, Paleontological Resources Management Plan (Public Version)”. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska – Lincoln, 2020, https://core.ac.uk/download/402561631.pdf
- Meek, Dean M 1989-. “Data Processing Methodologies to Investigate the Association between Depositional Environments and Trace Fossil Occurrence”. ‘University of Saskatchewan Library’, 2019, https://core.ac.uk/download/226132559.pdf
- Donoghue, Philip C J, Lenton, T.M., Liu, Alex G S C, Poulton, et al.. “The origin and rise of complex life:progress requires interdisciplinary integration and hypothesis testing”. ‘The Royal Society’, 2020, https://core.ac.uk/download/323962348.pdf
- Brouwer, Nathan, Currie, Adrian, McQueen, Eden, Novick, et al.. “Kon-Tiki Experiments”. 2019, https://core.ac.uk/download/295732729.pdf
- Bailer-Jones, C.A.L. Bailer-Jones, Clube, Da-li, Fisher, Garwin, Gillman, et al.. “The evidence for and against astronomical impacts on climate change and mass extinctions: A review”. ‘Cambridge University Press (CUP)’, 2009, http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.3919
- Bapst, David W., Hopkins, Melanie J., Simpson, Carl, Warnock, et al.. “The inseparability of sampling and time and its influence on attempts to unify the molecular and fossil records”. 2018, http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.11270
- Antonelli, Alexandre, Barbolini, Natasha, Bogotá-Angel, Raul Giovanni, Bouchal, et al.. “The evolutionary history of the Central Asian steppe-desert taxon Nitraria (Nitrariaceae) as revealed by integration of fossil pollen morphology and molecular data”. Oxford University Press, 2023, https://core.ac.uk/download/588770365.pdf
- Taesuk, Nonthiwat. “Impacts of environmental change on large mammal distributions in Southeast Asia”. UCL (University College London), 2021, https://core.ac.uk/download/483550567.pdf
- Witkowski, Caitlyn. “Mimicking Early Stages Of Diagenesis In Modern Metasequoia Leaves Implications For Plant Fossil Lagerstätten”. Bryant Digital Repository, 2014, https://core.ac.uk/download/132775241.pdf
- Bolt, Chris A.. “Environmental Education in the Public Sphere: Comparing Practice with Psychosocial Determinants of Behavior and Societal Change”. Fisher Digital Publications, 2017, https://core.ac.uk/download/129153482.pdf
- R. Hoffmann, Joshua S. Slattery, I. Kruta, B. Linzmeier, R. Lemanis, A. Mironenko, Stijn Goolaerts, et al.. “Recent advances in heteromorph ammonoid palaeobiology”. Biological Reviews, 2021, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c853ead86b502b167c28887bdfb6826a8d55010
- Lynn L Anderson-Carpenter, J. McLachlan, S. T. Jackson, M. Kuch, Candice Y. Lumibao, Candice Y. Lumibao, J. McLachlan, et al.. “Impact of past environmental changes on the genetic diversity of the remnant natural populations of Cilician fir in Lebanon”. 2020, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d70ba8fc4442ce3a0a1fadcd6ff9efe620923963
- Dorador, Javier, Flores Villarejo, José Abel, González Lanchas, Alba, Rodríguez-Tovar, et al.. “Trace fossil characterization during Termination V and MIS 11 at the western Mediterranean: Connection between surface conditions and deep environment”. Elsevier, 2022, https://core.ac.uk/download/621163387.pdf
- Dorador Rodríguez, Javier, González Lanchas, Alba, Rodríguez Tovar, Francisco J.. “Trace fossil characterization during Termination V and MIS 11 at the western Mediterranean: Connection between surface conditions and deep environment”. ‘Elsevier BV’, 2022, https://core.ac.uk/download/527689502.pdf