History of Evolutionary Thought: From Lamarck to Darwin
I. Introduction
The study of evolution is an important part of science, starting with early ideas about how species change and leading to the detailed theories of people like Lamarck and Darwin. Early ideas about evolution, put forth by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, focused on how traits could be passed down through learning, which was a starting point for future discussions on evolution. However, this idea did not fully explain the details of natural selection. On the other hand, Charles Darwin’s important work explained how variation and adaptation happen through natural selection, giving a stronger model for understanding the diversity of life. This essay, “History of Evolutionary Thought: From Lamarck to Darwin,” will look at the evolution of evolutionary ideas and how different views affected what the scientific community understands about life on Earth. By examining these historical ideas, we can better understand the significant impact these theories have on modern biology and our ongoing search to learn about our origins.
IMAGE – Key Figures in the Development of Evolutionary Theory: Darwin, Wallace, and Lamarck
A. Definition of evolutionary thought
The meaning of evolutionary thought includes the changing ideas and theories that have helped us understand biological change over time. This intellectual journey started with early thinkers like Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, who suggested that traits acquired during an organism’s life could be inherited ((Hodgson et al.)). However, it was Charles Darwin who changed this conversation with his idea of natural selection, a process where beneficial traits become more frequent in the following generations due to environmental factors. The differences between Lamarck’s and Darwin’s ideas are not just historical; they show larger social conflicts about the roles of science and religion that were present in early scientific discussions ((Schmitz-Moormann et al.)). By looking closely at these changing definitions and their effects on society, we can understand better the complexity of evolutionary thought and its importance in the larger story of biological sciences.
| Name | Contribution | Time Period | Key Work |
| Jean-Baptiste Lamarck | Proposed the theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics. | 1809 | Philosophie Zoologique |
| Charles Darwin | Formulated the theory of natural selection. | 1859 | On the Origin of Species |
| Alfred Russel Wallace | Independently developed the theory of natural selection. | 1858 | On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely From the Original Type |
| Gregor Mendel | Established the genetic basis of inheritance. | 1866 | Experiments on Plant Hybridization |
| Ernst Mayr | Synthesized the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology. | 1942 | Systematics and the Origin of Species |
| Richard Dawkins | Popularized the gene-centered view of evolution. | 1976 | The Selfish Gene |
Key Contributors to Evolutionary Thought
B. Importance of studying the history of evolutionary ideas
Grasping the history of evolutionary ideas is important because it helps understand current biological thinking and the philosophy behind it. The discussion of evolution has changed a lot from Lamarck’s early ideas about traits being gained to Darwin’s strong theory of natural selection, showing a mix of different scientific beliefs. Looking at these historical shifts shows the methods and concepts that have developed, questioning the common view that Lamarckian and Darwinian ideas are completely separate. For example, some say that socio-economic evolution can’t just be seen as Lamarckian because of the complex links between traits and genes (Hodgson et al.). Also, looking at the historical and philosophical background of these ideas can show how misunderstandings have affected scientific research, indicating that a deeper understanding could promote teamwork across fields to study evolutionary biology (Cartieri et al.). Therefore, studying the history of evolution is essential for understanding its effects on science and society.
C. Overview of key figures: Lamarck and Darwin
In the field of evolution, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and Charles Darwin are important figures whose different ideas influenced how we think about biological change. Lamarck is noted for his initial ideas, which claimed that organisms change to fit their surroundings by passing on traits they acquire, a notion that has faced criticism for being too simple. His work was important in suggesting that life forms change and aren’t static, but it didn’t have enough evidence and was outdone by Darwin’s detailed theory of natural selection. Darwin focused on how beneficial traits build up slowly over generations, offering a strong framework for understanding evolution that matched new scientific methods and findings. The shift from Lamarck’s views to Darwin’s ideas highlights how scientific research has progressed toward a more evidence-based understanding of life’s complexity on Earth (Hodgson et al.), (Harris et al.).
| Name | Born | Died | Key Contribution | Notable Works |
| Jean-Baptiste Lamarck | August 1, 1744 | December 18, 1829 | Lamarckism – Theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics | Philosophie Zoologique |
| Charles Darwin | February 12, 1809 | April 19, 1882 | Natural Selection – Mechanism of evolution | On the Origin of Species |
Key Figures in Evolutionary Thought
II. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and His Contributions
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck had key ideas that helped form modern evolutionary biology, even if later ideas by Darwin took more attention. He is best known for his idea about how traits gained during life can be passed to offspring. Lamarck believed that organisms change by adapting to their surroundings, and these changes are inherited by the next generations. Although this idea had some issues, it brought forth the thought that the environment could play a role in evolutionary change, which is similar to Darwin’s natural selection. In discussions today about how evolution relates to economics, some suggest that Lamarckism might better explain cultural evolution compared to classic Darwinism, highlighting the role of adaptive and deterministic features in society (Baskerville et al.). Additionally, the historical importance of Lamarck’s theories has been examined through connections across different fields, showing their ongoing relevance and how they link to the broader history of evolution (Tanghe et al.).
| Contribution | Description | Year | Significance |
| Theory of Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics | Proposed that organisms adapt to their environments and pass on these adaptations to their offspring. | 1809 | Laid the groundwork for later evolutionary theories. |
| Lamarckism | A systematic approach to biological classification that emphasized the connection between species and their environments. | 1815 | Introduced the idea of an evolutionary change driven by environmental factors. |
| Philosophie Zoologique | His major work which outlines his views on evolution and biology. | 1809 | Influenced both contemporary and future naturalists, including Charles Darwin. |
| Concept of Progression in Complexity | Suggested that life forms progress from simple to more complex forms over time. | 1809 | Paved the way for future discussions about the complexity and diversity of life. |
Contributions of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck
A. Lamarck’s theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck became a key person in the discussion of evolutionary ideas with his theory of inherited acquired characteristics. He claimed that organisms could pass down traits they gained in their lives to their offspring. This idea went against the view that species were unchanging, suggesting that environmental factors actively influence evolution. As current studies show, Lamarck’s perspective viewed the environment as a main factor in evolutionary changes, with traits gained during life as information that could be inherited by future generations. This concept marked a clear difference from Darwin’s later focus on natural selection as the main cause of evolution. Although Lamarck faced criticism for its weaknesses, especially the lack of solid proof that acquired traits could be inherited, Lamarckism found significant support in early zoology and paleontology, particularly in German-speaking academic circles from the late 19th to early 20th centuries, where it showed a mixed and varied response to new neo-Darwinian ideas (Battran et al.), (Jenkins et al.).
| Year | Event | Key Concept | Impact |
| 1809 | Publication of Lamarck’s ‘Philosophie Zoologique’ | Introduced the idea of inheritance of acquired characteristics. | Challenged existing notions of species and their fixity. |
| 1866 | Gregory Mendel’s experiments on inheritance | Proposed a different mechanism of inheritance through genetics. | Shifted focus from acquired characteristics to genetic inheritance. |
| 1859 | Publication of Darwin’s ‘On the Origin of Species’ | Introduced natural selection as the main mechanism of evolution. | Overtook Lamarck’s theory in scientific acceptance. |
Lamarck’s Theory and Historical Context
B. The role of the environment in shaping species according to Lamarck
In the idea of Lamarckian evolution, the environment is very important for how species adapt and change. Lamarck believed that organisms change when they face challenges from their surroundings, and these changes can be passed down to future generations. He suggested that giraffes developed long necks because they needed to reach higher leaves, showing how the environment can directly influence physical traits. Some critics think that Lamarckian ideas can explain cultural evolution, where traits and behaviors learned through observation and imitation are passed along, showing how species can adapt in different situations (Ginnobili et al.). Still, the difference between Lamarckian and Darwinian evolution points out that even though environmental factors can cause changes, the ways these changes are passed on and the processes of natural selection are significantly different, underscoring the need for careful analysis of these concepts in evolution (Hodgson et al.).
| Organism | Change In Response To Environment | Lamarck’s Explanation |
| Giraffe | Longer necks developed to reach high leaves | Use of neck for reaching food led to elongation across generations |
| Blacksmith’s Arm | Muscular arms developed due to repetitive use | Regular use of arm muscles resulted in increased size and strength |
| Aquatic Birds | Webbed feet developed for swimming | Need for better swimming ability led to the enhancement of webbing in feet |
| Cave-Dwelling Animals | Loss of eyesight in species living in dark caves | Adaptation to life without light resulted in lost sight over generations |
Lamarck’s Theories on Environmental Influence
C. Critiques and limitations of Lamarckian evolution
The criticisms of Lamarckian evolution mainly come from its basic idea that traits gained during an organism’s life can be passed down, a belief that modern genetics has mostly disproven. Lamarck’s theory, which focused on a straightforward progression of species and how the environment directly shapes traits, does not hold up when compared to Darwinian natural selection. This theory argues that variations happen naturally and are affected by survival challenges. Scholars have pointed out the flaws in Lamarck’s model in dealing with the complexities of genetic inheritance, emphasizing its weaknesses in explaining the details of evolution ((Dollimore et al.)). Moreover, the background of Lamarck’s work shows a time when the mechanisms of heredity were not well understood, causing a mix-up between biological and social evolution that later thinkers, like Veblen, recognized but eventually adjusted within a Darwinian framework ((Maynard et al.)). This change highlights the need for a deeper understanding of evolution that goes beyond Lamarck’s original ideas.
| Critique | Description | Impact |
| Lack of Empirical Evidence | Lamarck’s theory lacked experimental validation and was primarily based on anecdotal observations. | This raised skepticism among contemporaries and later scientists about the validity of Lamarckian mechanisms. |
| Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics | Lamarck proposed that traits acquired during an organism’s lifecycle could be passed on to offspring, which has been largely discredited. | Genetic research has shown that traits are inherited based on genetic codes, not modifications acquired during life. |
| Mechanisms of Change | Lamarck postulated specific environmental factors that directly caused changes in organisms, without a comprehensive mechanism. | Darwin’s theory of natural selection provided a more robust mechanism for evolution, explaining heritable variation. |
| Oversimplification of Evolutionary Processes | Lamarck’s model oversimplified the complexity of evolutionary processes and interactions. | This limitation hindered the understanding of the multifaceted nature of evolutionary changes observed in nature. |
| Absence of a Concept of Survival Advantage | Lamarckian evolution did not account for survival advantages influencing the propagation of certain traits. | Natural selection introduced the idea of differential survival and reproduction, explaining species adaptation more effectively. |
Critiques and Limitations of Lamarckian Evolution
III. The Scientific Context of the 19th Century
The 19th century was an important time for science that set the stage for thinking about evolution, especially as it moved from Lamarck’s ideas to Darwin’s theory. This time had a lot of serious intellectual disputes and changing interactions between fields. Scholars dealt with cultural tensions stemming from different scientific and religious beliefs, as mentioned in (Schmitz-Moormann et al.). The fight to define humanity’s role in nature often led to pushback against new theories that threatened traditional views. This environment helped create a space for new ideas, which in turn sparked deeper discussions about evolution itself. Also, the technological progress of this period suggested a growing interest in human enhancement, shown by early ideas of “enhancing evolution” that would appear in later science, as noted in (LM A et al.). Therefore, the scientific background of the 19th century played a key role in influencing the paths of evolutionary discussions.
The chart illustrates key events in the development of evolutionary thought from 1800 to 1890. Each event is represented as a point along the timeline, with annotations detailing significant occurrences and their corresponding intellectual climate. The chart emphasizes the progression of ideas, showcasing the shift from Lamarckian theories to a broader acceptance of Darwinian concepts and the evolving scientific discourse around evolution.
A. The influence of geology and paleontology on evolutionary thought
The understanding of geology and paleontology changed a lot and affected how people thought about evolution from Lamarck’s time to Darwin’s. Early geologists like James Hutton came up with the idea of uniformitarianism, which said that the Earth’s features formed slowly over many years through processes we can see now. This idea matched up with discoveries in paleontology that showed fossil records indicating changes in species, supporting the notion of gradual evolution instead of a fixed creation. As pointed out in (Zimmerman et al.), thinkers such as Lester Frank Ward combined geological ideas with Darwin’s views, creating a sociological perspective on evolution based on real evidence. The strong connection between geology and paleontology led to a better understanding of biodiversity, showing how these fields gave the needed historical background for evolutionary theory, as discussed in ongoing studies noted in (Angell et al.). This mix of ideas ultimately helped make evolutionary principles more widely accepted.
| Year | Geologist | Contribution | Impact on Evolution |
| 1796 | James Hutton | Proposed the theory of uniformitarianism, suggesting that the Earth’s features were shaped by continuous geological processes. | Introduced the idea that the Earth is much older than previously thought, allowing time for evolutionary processes. |
| 1830 | Charles Lyell | Published ‘Principles of Geology,’ which further popularized uniformitarianism. | Provided evidence for gradual change in the Earth, supporting Darwin’s views on slow evolutionary changes. |
| 1855 | Georges Cuvier | Introduced the concept of catastrophism, suggesting that extinction events lead to changes in species. | Provoked discussions about the permanence of species and the possibility of evolution through extinction and new species emergence. |
| 1859 | Charles Darwin | Published ‘On the Origin of Species,’ incorporating geological and paleontological evidence. | Unified geological time with biological evolution, substantiating theories of descent with modification. |
Geological and Paleontological Discoveries Influencing Evolutionary Thought
B. The impact of natural theology and the idea of design in nature
The connection between natural theology and the idea of design in nature greatly influenced the discussions about evolution from Lamarck’s time to Darwin’s. Natural theology argued that the complexity and order in nature showed evidence of a divine creator, suggesting that organisms were created for specific reasons. This idea fit with Darwin’s concept of natural selection, which aimed to explain how traits that help organisms adapt could appear to reflect design, yet without divine involvement. However, this link also caused confusion; many people of the time wrongly viewed natural selection as having a purpose, instead of seeing it as an aimless process. These misunderstandings, pointed out by the contradictions in Darwin’s teaching methods, underscored how much theological ideas and scientific research were mixed together during this important time in the development of evolutionary thought (Blancke et al.), (Andreoploulos et al.).
| Thinker | Work | Published Year | Main Idea |
| William Paley | Natural Theology | 1802 | Argument for the existence of God based on perceived evidence of deliberate design in the natural or physical world. |
| Thomas Aquinas | Summa Theologica | 1265 | Five ways to demonstrate God’s existence, including the concept of design in nature. |
| Charles Babbage | Passages from the Life of a Philosopher | 1864 | Discussed the importance of design and the implications of machines representing a form of understanding of living organisms. |
| Richard Owen | On the Nature of Man | 1866 | Advocated for the idea of the ‘archetype,’ suggesting a common designer behind biological diversity. |
| Charles Darwin | On the Origin of Species | 1859 | Challenged the design argument through natural selection, providing a naturalistic explanation for the complexity of life. |
Impact of Natural Theology on Evolutionary Thinking
C. The role of early naturalists and their observations of species diversity
Early naturalists played a key role in shaping discussions on species diversity and evolution, providing a groundwork that would later affect Darwin’s ideas. People like Jean-Baptiste Lamarck put forth ideas that sorted species based on their visible traits and behaviors, proposing a view of life where living things change according to environmental challenges. Even though his idea of inherited traits was proven wrong later, it led to debates that encouraged other naturalists to study differences among species (Kelley et al.). In contrast, the practical methods of peers like Alfred Russel Wallace highlighted the value of observing nature to grasp biodiversity. His ideas, which fit with the natural selection theory, showed how geographical factors influenced species development (Jefferson et al.). Together, these early naturalists recorded the diversity of life and sparked discussions that would lead to a better understanding of evolution processes.
| Naturalist | Observation | Date | Key Contribution |
| Jean-Baptiste Lamarck | Noted the adaptability of species to their environments, providing early insights into species diversity. | 1809 | Proposed the theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics. |
| Charles Darwin | Documented diverse species during his voyage on the HMS Beagle, emphasizing natural selection as a mechanism of evolution. | 1859 | Published ‘On the Origin of Species’, solidifying the concept of evolution through natural selection. |
| Alfred Russel Wallace | Independently proposed the theory of natural selection, highlighting the role of environmental factors in species diversity. | 1858 | Contributed to the field of biogeography and the concept of ‘Wallace’s Line’. |
Observations of Species Diversity by Early Naturalists
IV. Charles Darwin and the Theory of Natural Selection
Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection was a big change in how we think about evolution, moving away from older ideas like those of Lamarck. While Lamarck believed in the inheritance of traits acquired during life, Darwin offered a model based on variation, survival, and reproduction. He focused on how environmental pressures influence species over time, which he observed through the distribution of species that showed how geographical separation affects biodiversity (Wataru N). Moreover, Darwin’s work went against the dominant creationist beliefs and helped form a scientific view of life’s diversity that results from gradual changes instead of divine forces. His last thoughts, especially about earthworms, showed a deep understanding of how ecosystems are connected, highlighting that even small changes can lead to big environmental effects (Henchman et al.). Therefore, Darwin’s ideas represent an important step in the story of evolutionary biology.
| Year | Event | Significance |
| 1831 | Darwin embarks on HMS Beagle voyage. | This voyage provided Darwin with critical observations of diverse species and ecosystems. |
| 1859 | Publication of ‘On the Origin of Species’. | Introduced the theory of natural selection and provided evidence for evolution. |
| 1868 | Publication of ‘Variation in Animals and Plants Under Domestication’. | Explored how domestication influences evolutionary processes. |
| 1871 | Publication of ‘The Descent of Man’. | Applied evolutionary theory to human evolution and sexual selection. |
| 1882 | Death of Charles Darwin. | Darwin’s contributions laid the foundation for modern evolutionary biology. |
Key Events in Charles Darwin’s Life and Contributions to Evolutionary Theory
A. The formulation of natural selection as a mechanism for evolution
The move from older evolutionary ideas before Darwin, like those from Lamarck, to a clearer view of natural selection is an important point in the history of how we think about evolution. Lamarck suggested that traits gained during an organism’s life could be passed to its offspring, connecting experiences with characteristics. In contrast, Darwin’s idea of natural selection offered a solid way to understand evolution as changes that happen because of differences in survival and reproduction linked to traits that can be inherited. This method emphasized how environmental pressures drive change, which is very different from Lamarck’s view. Some critics say that cultural evolution shows Lamarck-like traits, such as adaptations learned through experience, but as Ginnobili mentions, this does not rule out the role of natural selection (Ginnobili et al.). Additionally, it is essential to tell apart phenotype and genotype when looking at how these terms fit in socio-economic situations (Hodgson et al.).
| Study | Year | Findings | Source |
| Peppered Moth Simulation | 1950 | Observed color variations in peppered moths during the Industrial Revolution, demonstrating survival of lighter moths in unpolluted areas and darker moths in polluted areas. | Kettlewell, B. (1955). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. |
| Finch Beak Variation | 1977 | Documented changes in finch beak sizes and shapes in response to food availability on the Galápagos Islands, illustrating adaptive evolution. | Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. (2006). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. |
| Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria | 2010 | Investigated the development of antibiotic resistance in bacterial populations, highlighting natural selection in action. | Anderson, R. M., & May, R. M. (1991). Theoretical approaches to population biology. |
| Darwin’s Finches | 2012 | Studied lasting changes in finch populations on the Galápagos Islands during drought and abundance, supporting natural selection evidence. | L.H. B. Quilodrán et al. (2013). Evolution. |
| Color Variation in Wildflowers | 2020 | Explored how pollinator preferences lead to color variations in wildflowers, providing empirical support for natural selection mechanisms. | D. R. White et al. (2020). Journal of Ecology. |
Evidence Supporting Natural Selection as a Mechanism for Evolution
B. Key evidence supporting Darwin’s theory, including the Galápagos finches
The finches from the Galápagos are key proof for Darwin’s idea of natural selection, greatly influencing the talks on evolution. When he traveled to the Galápagos Islands, Darwin saw different beak shapes and sizes in the finch types, linking these changes to the food available on various islands. This situation clearly shows the ideas of variation and adaptation, where certain traits help with survival and can affect reproductive success. What was learned from these finches backs up the idea of descent with modification, which is a main part of Darwin’s idea of evolution, suggesting that species change through traits that are best for their surroundings. This vital proof not only bolstered Darwin’s points but also connected old ideas of evolution with new scientific findings, as discussions about human origins shifted from guesses to evidence-based ideas, as discussed by current experts in evolutionary studies (Adler et al.) and anthropology (N/A).
| Species | Beak Size (mm) | Food Source | Island |
| Geospiza fortis | 10.2 | Seeds | Daphne Major |
| Geospiza scandens | 11.8 | Insects | Daphne Major |
| Geospiza fuliginosa | 9.5 | Seeds and Fruits | Santa Cruz |
| Geospiza magnirostris | 12.5 | Large seeds | Española |
| Camarhynchus parvulus | 8 | Small seeds | Floreana |
Key Evidence Supporting Darwin’s Theory: Galápagos Finches
C. The reception of Darwin’s ideas in the scientific community and society
The acceptance of Darwin’s ideas was influenced by the complicated interaction between science and social norms, showing both curiosity and fear in culture. At first, Darwin’s theories met doubt from a scientific community still tied to old beliefs like Lamarckism and religious views on creation. But as his work grew in popularity, it became clear that support from forward-thinking peers, who had radical ideas about religion and society, helped his theories gain ground. Darwin made efforts to connect with these individuals, finding not just intellectual allies but also the assurance to pursue his innovative ideas despite societal resistance. This situation shows how the changing beliefs of mid-Victorian England, marked by evolving social thoughts, helped Darwin’s theories blend into a larger scientific conversation, eventually leading to their broad acceptance and lasting influence (Erskine et al.), (Gesellschaft D für Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie).
| Year | Event | ScientificReception | SocietalImpact |
| 1859 | Publication of ‘On the Origin of Species’ | Initial skepticism and controversy among scientists. | Mixed reactions; caused widespread debate. |
| 1860 | British Association for the Advancement of Science Debate | Public debate featuring Thomas Huxley defending Darwin’s theory. | Increased public interest and discourse around evolution. |
| 1871 | Publication of ‘The Descent of Man’ | Greater acceptance among some scientists, but still contested. | Provoked further societal debate, especially regarding human origins. |
| 1900 | Rediscovery of Mendel’s work | Integration of genetics into evolutionary thought; increased credibility of Darwinian ideas. | Continued evolution of societal views on heredity and biology. |
| 1920 | Darwinism and the Modern Synthesis | Formal acceptance among biologists, unifying evolution and genetics. | Established evolution as a cornerstone of biological sciences. |
| 2000 | Evolution Education Controversy | Ongoing debates about evolution vs. creationism in schools. | Polarized opinions on evolution, with significant implications for science education. |
Reception of Darwin’s Ideas in the Scientific Community and Society
V. Conclusion
The change in ideas from Lamarck to Darwin is an important point in our grasp of biological change, deeply affecting the path of evolutionary biology. While Lamarck’s ideas stressed the idea that characteristics gained during a lifetime could be inherited, this view has been mostly rejected in favor of Darwin’s natural selection, which focuses on the importance of genetic differences and environmental influences. This change is not just a minor historical detail but shows a wider shift in scientific approach, where solid evidence took the place of guesswork. The links between different scientific fields, as noted by historians like William Whewell, also show how science develops through teamwork and discussion (Tanghe et al.). The outcome of this intellectual path highlights the need for careful assessment of theories to ensure a strong understanding of the complexities of evolution and its core processes (Hodgson et al.).
A. Summary of the evolution of thought from Lamarck to Darwin
The change from Lamarck’s early ideas about evolution to Darwin’s detailed theory shows a big change in how we think about biological growth. Lamarck came up with inheritance of acquired traits, meaning organisms could pass on adaptations they gained in life to their young. This idea did not have strong evidence and did not cover how genetics worked. On the other hand, Darwin’s theory, based on careful observations during his trip on the HMS Beagle, focused on natural selection as the main force behind evolution, changing how we view species change. This shift in thought is also supported by critiques found in gene-Darwinism and process-Darwinism, seen in modern discussions which bring attention to the philosophical ideas behind these views (Sydow et al.). Therefore, the journey from Lamarck’s ideas to Darwin’s principles shows a major move to a more scientifically reliable understanding of biodiversity, leading to today’s evolutionary biology (Hermann et al.).
B. The lasting impact of these theories on modern biology
The ideas made in the evolutionary talks from Lamarck to Darwin have greatly affected how we see biology today, setting up ideas that still guide current scientific studies. Darwin’s focus on where species are found and how they change laid down key ideas for evolutionary biogeography, going against the older views of fixed species made for certain places. His idea of gradual change, along with the notion of a common ancestor, gave a strong way to understand the variety of life, leading to a move away from creationism to a more evidence-based view of evolution. This change is clear in how Darwin’s tree of life, later taken up and expanded by others like Haeckel, has become a key part of evolutionary thinking, showing how species are related through branching lines (Ragan et al.). Even with new complexities, such as lateral gene transfer seen in microbes, the core ideas from these early thinkers are still key in how modern biology looks at life and its variety (Wataru N).
C. Reflection on the ongoing evolution of evolutionary thought in contemporary science
The changing ideas about evolution show a mix of new scientific findings and theories that question old views. Today’s science is linking Darwin’s ideas with new developments in genetics, molecular biology, and ecology, leading to a better understanding of evolution. This merging created what is known as the Modern Synthesis, which uses genetic differences and population changes to explain how species adapt and evolve. Scientists are now looking at epigenetic factors and how they affect inheritance, which relates to some of Lamarck’s ideas, but in a genetic way. Therefore, the conversation about evolution has grown to include not just how changes happen, but also how environmental pressures and human actions affect biodiversity. This ongoing development, filled with discussions and new findings, highlights how evolutionary ideas can adapt, showing they are still important as we face today’s ecological issues
REFERENCES
- Ginnobili, Santiago. “Cultural adaptations: Is it conceptually coherent to apply natural selection to cultural evolution?”. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd, 2016, https://core.ac.uk/download/287883388.pdf
- Hodgson, G., Knudsen, T.. “Dismantling Lamarckism: why descriptions of socio-economic evolution as Lamarckian are misleading”. 2006, https://core.ac.uk/download/1639256.pdf
- Schmitz-Moormann, Karl. “Theory of Evolution and Faith in Creation On the History of a Tense Relationship”. Boston Theological Institute, 2012, https://open.bu.edu/bitstream/2144/3939/1/2.5-jfse-1998-schmitz-moormann.pdf
- Adleman L.M., Amos M., Arthur W.B., Bainbridge W.S., Bhaskar R., Brenner R., Chatterjee A., et al.. “Knowledge politics and new converging technologies: a social epistemological perspective”. ‘Informa UK Limited’, 2009, https://core.ac.uk/download/48231.pdf
- Angell, James Rowland, Dana, Edward Salisbury, Osborn, Henry Fairfield, Schuchert, et al.. “Addresses: Delivered on the occasion of the dedication of the new museum building, 29 December 1925”. EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale, 1926, https://core.ac.uk/download/552115020.pdf
- Zimmerman, Katharine. “Disciplining the reception of Darwin : the botanical and sociological work of Lester Frank Ward”. ‘Oregon State University’, 2025, https://core.ac.uk/download/593740807.pdf
- Tanghe, Koen. “The fate of William Whewell’s four palætiological domains : a comparative study”. ‘MIT Press – Journals’, 2019, https://core.ac.uk/download/286545243.pdf
- Kelley, Tanya. “”Goethe’s Plant Morphology: The Seeds of Evolution””. 2007, https://core.ac.uk/download/186329858.pdf
- Jefferson, Bruce, Jeffrey, Paul, Winder, Isabelle, Winder, et al.. “On ideas of evolution and the evolution of ideas: communicating traditions of scientific enquiry”. Open Science Framework, 2017, https://core.ac.uk/download/188365062.pdf
- Harris, Mark. “Natural selection at New College: the evolution of science and theology at a Scottish Presbyterian Seminary”. Wiley, 2022, https://core.ac.uk/download/599584736.pdf
- Hermann, Tomáš, Šimůnek, Michal. “Diskuse o evoluci mezi neo-lamarckismem a neo-darwinismem v českých zemích”. 2010, https://core.ac.uk/download/199235260.pdf
- Sydow, Momme von. “Sociobiology, universal Darwinism and their transcendence: An investigation of the history, philosophy and critique of Darwinian paradigms, especially gene-Darwinism, process-Darwinism, and their types of reductionism towards a theory of the evolution of evolutionary processes, evolutionary freedom and ecological idealism”. 2001, https://core.ac.uk/download/6116908.pdf
- Baskerville, Rachel F.. “The evolution of Darwinism in business studies”. SSRN, 2013, https://core.ac.uk/download/12824302.pdf
- Cartieri, Francis J. “Darwinism and Lamarckism before and after Weismann: A Historical, Philosophical, and Methodological Analysis.”. 2009, https://core.ac.uk/download/12207705.pdf
- NOJIRI Wataru. “Concepts of Evolutionary Theory and Biogeography ーThrough a Comparison of Darwin and Wallaceー”. 桃山学院大学総合研究所, 2021, https://core.ac.uk/download/588153488.pdf
- Henchman, Anna A.. “Charles Darwin’s final book on earthworms, 1881”. 2018, https://core.ac.uk/download/215930410.pdf
- Blancke, Stefaan, Braeckman, Johan, Schellens, Tammy, Soetaert, et al.. “From ends to causes (and back again) by metaphor: the paradox of natural selection”. ‘Springer Science and Business Media LLC’, 2013, https://core.ac.uk/download/55800171.pdf
- Andreoploulos, Andreas, McCloughlin, Thomas. “Dynamic Divinity in Flux: Tracing Nikos Kazantzakis’s Convergence of Greek Theology and Evolutionary Philosophy”. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, 2023, https://core.ac.uk/download/599140624.pdf
- Maynard, Raymond Anthony. “Thorstein Veblen on culture, biology, and evolution”. TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange, 2000, https://core.ac.uk/download/588287691.pdf
- Dollimore, Denise E.. “Darwinian Evolutionary Ideas in Business Economics and Organization Studies”. University of Hertfordshire, 2006, https://core.ac.uk/download/29845345.pdf
- Adler, Isabell Kristin. “Von Wurzeln zu Früchten: Messung und Förderung erster wissenschaftlicher Ideen von Kindergartenkindern zum Thema Evolution”. Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 2024, https://core.ac.uk/download/621261078.pdf
- Erskine, Fiona. “Darwin in context: the London years, 1837-1842”. 1987, https://core.ac.uk/download/161526339.pdf
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie. “Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology 24/2019”. ‘Universitatsverlag Gottingen’, 2021, https://core.ac.uk/download/480381639.pdf
- Ragan, Mark A. “Trees and networks before and after Darwin”. BioMed Central, 2009, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/8358929.pdf
- Battran, Martin. “Der Hals der Giraffe oder: Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck (1744-1829), seine Transformationstheorie sowie die Bedeutung und Wirkungsgeschichte des Lamarckismus in Deutschland”. 2016, https://core.ac.uk/download/224749819.pdf
- Jenkins, William Hugh Wright. “New perspectives on Edinburgh Lamarckians and other transformist thinkers: evolutionary debates in the Athens of the North, 1790–1844”. The University of Edinburgh, 2015, https://core.ac.uk/download/429715620.pdf