Types of Forests: Tropical, Temperate, and Boreal Biomes
Table of Contents
I. Introduction to Forest Types
Forests cover approximately 31% of the Earths land area and are classified into three primary types: tropical, temperate, and boreal biomes. Each of these forest types is characterized by unique climatic conditions, biodiversity, and ecological functions, which significantly influence global carbon cycles and environmental health. Tropical forests, found near the equator, are known for their high biodiversity and year-round rainfall, supporting complex ecosystems. In contrast, temperate forests, located in mid-latitude regions, display distinct seasonal changes that influence species composition and productivity. Boreal forests, predominant in northern latitudes, experience cold climates, leading to adaptations in flora and fauna. Understanding these forest classifications is crucial not only for conservation efforts but also for comprehending their roles in climate regulation and biodiversity preservation. The image depicting the global distribution of forest types provides a visual representation that underscores the geographical significance of these biomes, enhancing our understanding of their relational dynamics.
A. Definition of Forests and Their Global Distribution
Forests are complex ecosystems characterized by a dominance of trees and undergrowth, with their definition encompassing a range of classifications based on vegetation types and geographical distribution. Globally, forests can be divided into three primary biomes: tropical, temperate, and boreal, each distinguished by distinct climatic conditions that influence their biodiversity. For instance, tropical forests, often located near the equator, exhibit high biodiversity and dense vegetation as depicted in , while temperate forests experience moderate climates and seasonal variations. Boreal forests, predominantly found in northern latitudes, showcase a unique ecology, primarily influenced by cold temperatures and substantial coniferous coverage. Understanding this classification is essential as it highlights the unique ecosystem services each forest type provides, such as carbon sequestration and habitat for myriad species, which are increasingly jeopardized by anthropogenic impacts. The economic ramifications of these losses are significant, particularly in boreal and warm mixed forests, as evidenced by findings presented in (A Markandya et al.) and (Fischer et al.).
| Forest Type | Area (Million Hectares) | Percentage of Global Forests (%) | Major Regions | Biodiversity Index |
| Tropical Forests | 1 | 47 | Amazon Basin, Central Africa, Southeast Asia | Very High |
| Temperate Forests | 1 | 32 | North America, Europe, East Asia | Moderate to High |
| Boreal Forests | 1 | 21 | Canada, Russia, Scandinavia | Low to Moderate |
Global Distribution of Forest Types
B. Factors That Influence Forest Types (Climate, Soil, Altitude)
Climate, soil, and altitude are critical determinants in defining forest types, fundamentally shaping the biodiversity, structure, and function of tropical, temperate, and boreal biomes. Tropical forests thrive in regions with warm temperatures and high rainfall, leading to rich biodiversity and dense vegetation. In contrast, temperate forests, located in areas experiencing distinct seasonal changes, require a nuanced balance of moisture and temperature for diverse tree species to coexist. Boreal forests, found at higher latitudes or altitudes, confront harsher climates with shorter growing seasons and poorer soil nutrients, primarily dominated by coniferous species adapted to these constraints. These environmental factors directly affect forest productivity and health, as understood through studies of forest dynamics under varying conditions (I Bukharina et al., p. 16-22). Furthermore, anthropogenic influences and their intricate relationships with climatic variations significantly alter these ecosystems, necessitating a deeper exploration of sustainable practices (R Nestby et al., p. 177-188). The complex interplay of these factors necessitates continual research to understand and preserve forest ecosystems effectively.
| Biome | Climate (°C) | Average Rainfall (mm) | Soil Type | Altitude (m) |
| Tropical Forest | 20-25 | 1750-2500 | Lateritic | 0-1500 |
| Temperate Forest | 0-20 | 750-1500 | Fertile loam | 0-2000 |
| Boreal Forest | -5-10 | 300-850 | Podzol | 0-2000 |
Factors Influencing Forest Types
II. Tropical Forests
Tropical forests are vital ecosystems characterized by their remarkable biodiversity and complex ecological dynamics. These forests, found near the equator, exhibit high species richness and are crucial in regulating global climate by sequestering carbon and influencing local weather patterns. The intricate relationships within tropical forest ecosystems illustrate the dependencies among flora and fauna, which are critically impacted by ongoing deforestation and climate change. As highlighted in recent studies, the conversion of tropical forests can have far-reaching hydrological consequences, potentially exacerbating flooding events downstream and affecting millions of people reliant on these ecosystems for water resources (Chomitz et al.). Furthermore, protected areas serve as a pivotal strategy in conserving these invaluable ecosystems, with increased global efforts focused on their establishment and maintenance (Gillespie et al.). The significance of tropical forests extends beyond their ecological roles; they are indispensable for sustaining human life and biodiversity at large, making their conservation an urgent priority. provides a visual synthesis of these forest systems, emphasizing their global distribution and ecological importance.
| Country | Area (Million Hectares) | Biodiversity Index | Deforestation Rate (%) |
| Brazil | 497 | 1.5 | 7.5 |
| Indonesia | 95.7 | 1.2 | 6 |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 126 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| Australia (Northern Territory) | 12.4 | 1.1 | 5.6 |
| Colombia | 34.5 | 1.3 | 4.8 |
Tropical Forests Data
A. Characteristics of Tropical Forests
Tropical forests stand out due to their unparalleled biodiversity and complex ecological structures. Characterized by a warm, humid climate, these forests experience high levels of precipitation, which fosters dense canopy layers that can reach heights of 30 meters or more. This vertical stratification supports an intricate web of life, where species adaptation is paramount. Plant functional traits, including leaf structure and growth patterns, play crucial roles in nutrient cycling and energy capture within these ecosystems, making them essential for understanding broader ecological dynamics, as highlighted in recent studies on functional traits in forest ecosystems (Natalia Pérez Harguindeguy et al., p. 167-167). Furthermore, tropical forests are significant carbon sinks, contributing to global climate regulation, which underscores their ecological importance amidst rising anthropogenic pressures. The distribution and characteristics of these forests are visually detailed in , illustrating their global significance and the urgent need for conservation efforts to protect these vital biomes.
| Characteristic | Value |
| Average Temperature (°C) | 20 – 25 |
| Annual Rainfall (mm) | 1750 – 2000 |
| Biodiversity Index | High (up to 50% of Earth’s species) |
| Strata Layers | Five (emergent, canopy, understory, forest floor) |
| Soil Type | Oxisols and Ultisols (nutrient-poor) |
| Common Flora | Broadleaf evergreen trees, vines, epiphytes |
| Common Fauna | Monkeys, birds, reptiles, insects |
Characteristics of Tropical Forests
B. Key Examples: Amazon Rainforest, Congo Basin
The Amazon Rainforest and the Congo Basin serve as pivotal examples of tropical biomes, exhibiting unparalleled biodiversity and complex ecological dynamics. The Amazon, often referred to as the lungs of the planet, plays a crucial role in carbon sequestration, absorbing vast amounts of CO2 and helping mitigate climate change (Ashton et al.). In contrast, the Congo Basin, though less publicized, harbors critical ecosystems and Indigenous cultures, demonstrating the importance of intact forest landscapes (IFLs) for preserving global biodiversity and environmental services (Austin et al.). Images depicting these biomes provide vital insights into their structural complexity and unique abiotic environments, emphasizing the ecological functions they fulfill, such as habitat provision and climate regulation . Together, these forests illustrate the intricate relationships between species diversity and forest structure, highlighting the urgent necessity for their conservation in the face of deforestation and climate change impacts.
| Region | Area (sq km) | Country | Biodiversity Index | Threats |
| Amazon Rainforest | 5500000 | Brazil, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana | 390 | Deforestation, Logging, Agriculture, Climate Change |
| Congo Basin | 3600000 | Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea | 150 | Deforestation, Mining, Agriculture, Logging |
Key Examples of Tropical Forests
C. Biodiversity and Endemism in Tropical Forests
Tropical forests are renowned for their unparalleled biodiversity and high levels of endemism, serving as critical habitats for an estimated half of the Earths terrestrial species. This remarkable diversity arises from a combination of climatic stability, complex ecological interactions, and a long evolutionary history, fostering the development of species unique to these ecosystems. The intricate layers of tropical forests provide niche habitats that support a plethora of organisms, from vibrant flora to numerous faunal species, facilitating ecological processes such as pollination and seed dispersal. However, the ongoing effects of climate change pose significant threats to these biodiverse systems, as shifts in climate conditions may lead to life zone changes predicted to impact up to 62 million km2 by the year 2070 (Paul R Elsen et al., p. 918-935). This imminent biodiversity loss is exacerbated by habitat destruction, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable conservation strategies to protect these irreplaceable ecosystems and their myriad species (Tomáš Větrovský et al.). provides a detailed overview of global forest biomes, reinforcing the unique contributions of tropical forests to global biodiversity.
| Region | Species Richness (Plant Species) | Endemic Species (Percentage) | Threat Level |
| Amazon Rainforest | 39000 | 25 | High |
| Congo Basin | 27000 | 30 | Moderate |
| Southeast Asian Rainforest | 24000 | 20 | High |
Biodiversity in Tropical Forests
III. Temperate Forests
Temperate forests, characterized by their moderate climate and rich biodiversity, serve as critical ecosystems for maintaining global ecological balance. Unlike tropical and boreal forests, temperate forests exhibit deciduous and evergreen species that adapt to seasonal changes in temperature and precipitation. These forests not only support diverse wildlife but also play vital roles in carbon sequestration and water regulation. However, the protection of temperate forests is alarmingly insufficient compared to their tropical and boreal counterparts. Research indicates that protected areas fail to represent the full geographic diversity of temperate forests, highlighting the urgent need for improved conservation strategies to ensure their survival and biodiversity (Gagnon et al.). Given the economic value attributed to ecosystem services provided by these forests, estimated losses from inaction are significant, emphasizing the importance of temperate forest management for environmental sustainability (A Markandya et al.). For visual context, the map illustrating global forest distributions succinctly encapsulates the geographical significance and diversity of temperate forests.
| Type of Temperate Forest | Average Annual Precipitation (mm) | Average Temperature (°C) | Dominant Tree Species |
| Deciduous Forest | 750 | 10 | Oak, Maple, Birch |
| Coniferous Forest | 400 | 5 | Pine, Spruce, Fir |
| Mixed Forest | 600 | 8 | Beech, Hemlock, Douglas Fir |
Temperate Forest Characteristics
A. Characteristics of Temperate Forests
In examining the characteristics of temperate forests, it is essential to recognize their ecological diversity and significant role in carbon sequestration. These forests, found primarily in regions with moderate climates, feature a rich assemblage of deciduous and evergreen trees, which support a variety of flora and fauna. The seasonal changes in temperature and precipitation create a dynamic ecosystem highly dependent on its abiotic environment. For instance, temperate forests exhibit higher biodiversity compared to boreal forests, fostering essential ecological services, including habitat preservation and pollution filtration. Moreover, the conversion of these forests to agricultural land can lead to substantial increases in atmospheric CO2, primarily due to the loss of biomass and soil carbon (see (Ciais P et al.)). Additionally, the economic implications of temperate forest degradation, estimated in billions, further underscore their importance (see (A Markandya et al.)). The accompanying image effectively illustrates the climate control functions of these forests, emphasizing their ecological significance.
Image : Comparative Analysis of Climate Control Functions in Tropical, Temperate, and Boreal Forests (The image presents a comparative overview of three types of forests: tropical, temperate, and boreal. Each section highlights critical climate control functions associated with the forest types, including their carbon storage capabilities, sun absorption levels, and cooling effects. Tropical forests exhibit strong carbon storage and evaporative cooling, while temperate forests demonstrate moderate conditions in both areas. Boreal forests show moderate carbon storage but weaker evaporative cooling features. The bottom half of the image contains a world map indicating regions where these forests are found, represented in green. This visual serves as an informative tool to understand the ecological roles of different forest types in climate regulation.)
B. Subtypes: Deciduous and Coniferous Forests
In the context of temperate forests, subtypes such as deciduous and coniferous forests exhibit distinct ecological characteristics and responses to their environments. Deciduous forests, characterized by trees that shed leaves in response to changing seasons, demonstrate a remarkable adaptability that allows them to thrive in regions with significant seasonal fluctuation. The annual leaf drop not only conserves water during winter but also contributes to nutrient recycling in the ecosystem, enhancing biodiversity. In contrast, coniferous forests, with their evergreen trees, are adapted to harsher climates, featuring needle-like leaves that reduce water loss and withstand heavy snowfall. The resilience of these forests is vital for maintaining biodiversity and carbon storage, as indicated by recent studies highlighting significant economic losses stemming from their degradation ((A Markandya et al.)). Furthermore, the pressing need to categorize and define land cover within these ecosystems illustrates the complex interplay between human activities and forest health ((Fischer et al.)). For visual context, the world map highlighting the distribution of these forests, such as those depicted in , effectively underscores their global significance.
| Forest Type | Characteristics | Geographic Distribution | Biodiversity Index | Average Annual Rainfall (inches) | Common Tree Species |
| Deciduous Forest | Trees that lose their leaves seasonally | Temperate regions, eastern North America, Europe, parts of Asia | High, with numerous species of plants and animals | 30-60 | Oak, Maple, Birch, Beech |
| Coniferous Forest | Trees that retain their needles year-round | Found in colder regions like Canada, Alaska, and Northern Europe | Moderate, supporting fewer species compared to deciduous forests | 20-40 | Pine, Spruce, Fir, Cedar |
Subtypes of Deciduous and Coniferous Forests
C. Seasonal Adaptations of Temperate Forest Species
The seasonal adaptations of temperate forest species exemplify the intricate relationship between organisms and their changing environment. As temperature and light fluctuate throughout the seasons, trees and other plant species exhibit unique morphological and physiological changes to enhance survival and reproduction. For example, deciduous trees like oaks and maples shed their leaves in winter to conserve water and energy, while spring ephemerals, such as trilliums, flower early before the tree canopy fully develops, capitalizing on the abundant sunlight. Additionally, these adaptations are not limited to flora; many animal species, including birds and mammals, also adjust their behavior and physiology, such as hibernation and migration, in response to seasonal changes. This cyclical rhythm of growth and dormancy is critical for maintaining ecological balance in temperate forests (Cantalapiedra et al.), (N/A). A visual representation of these seasonal dynamics, exemplified in , further underscores the importance of these adaptations within temperate biomes.
| Species | Adaptation | Behavior | Impact on Ecosystem |
| Eastern Gray Squirrel | Hoarding food in autumn | Uses cached nuts throughout winter | Disperses seeds, aiding forest regeneration |
| Red Maple | Deciduous leaves | Sheds leaves to conserve water during winter | Provides habitat and food for wildlife |
| American Black Bear | Hibernation | Stores fat for winter dormancy | Controls small animal populations, aids in seed dispersal |
| White-tailed Deer | Changing diet | Switches from lush greens to woody browse in winter | Browses on saplings, influencing forest composition |
| Wood Frog | Freeze tolerance | Can survive partial freezing of body tissues | Prey for larger animals, contributes to food web |
Seasonal Adaptations of Temperate Forest Species
IV. Boreal Forests (Taiga)
Boreal forests, also known as taigas, represent a unique biome characterized by coniferous tree species such as spruce, fir, and pine, which dominate the landscape across northern latitudes. These forests play a critical role in carbon cycling, sequestering significant amounts of carbon dioxide and moderating climate change effects. Unlike temperate and tropical forests, boreal ecosystems are adapted to harsh conditions, reflecting a complex interplay of factors including long winters and short growing seasons, leading to distinctive ecological processes. As highlighted in contemporary research, the relationship between forest productivity and climate change is multifaceted, with disturbances such as fire and human activities significantly impacting forest composition and health (Minnen et al.), (Wang et al.). A visual representation of these dynamics is illustrated in , which showcases the geographical distribution and ecological characteristics of boreal forests, providing essential context for understanding their global significance and vulnerability in the face of climate change.
| Characteristic | Value | Source |
| Average Temperature (°C) | -5 | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) |
| Annual Precipitation (mm) | 300 – 850 | World Bank |
| Coverage Area (million sq. km) | 17 | Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) |
| Biodiversity Index | 2.3 | Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) |
| Carbon Storage (billion tons) | 800 | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) |
Boreal Forests (Taiga) Characteristics and Statistics
A. Climate and Features of Boreal Forests
Boreal forests, located primarily in the high northern latitudes, are characterized by a distinctive climate that significantly influences their ecological features. Predominantly found in regions with long, cold winters and short, mild summers, these forests experience a subarctic climate that limits biodiversity compared to their tropical and temperate counterparts. Additionally, boreal forests receive moderate precipitation, often in the form of snow, which affects soil moisture and nutrient cycles essential for forest growth. The tree species that dominate these regions, such as conifers, are well-adapted to the harsh conditions, developing thick bark and needle-like leaves to minimize water loss. Such adaptations significantly contribute to the forest’s resilience and ecological functions, including carbon storage and habitat provision. Understanding these climatic conditions and their effects on boreal forests is crucial, as evidenced in studies highlighting their crucial ecological roles (Gagnon et al.) (Minnen et al.). The illustrative details provided by further emphasize this biomes unique climate and features.
B. Species Adaptations in Cold Conditions
The adaptations of species thriving in cold environments, particularly those found in boreal forests, illustrate the intricate relationship between climatic challenges and biological evolution. Organisms in these regions exhibit physiological and behavioral traits designed to withstand extreme temperatures and seasonal changes. For example, many mammals possess insulating fur or blubber that provides essential warmth, while certain bird species develop high-fat diets to sustain energy levels during harsh winters. Additionally, plants in boreal forests demonstrate adaptations such as conical shapes to shed snow and minimize damage, alongside needle-like leaves that reduce water loss. Such evolutionary mechanisms point to the concept of phylogenetic niche conservatism, where existing traits are retained over time to facilitate survival in consistent environmental conditions (Cantalapiedra et al.). As the Arctic and Subarctic ecosystems are comparatively young, ongoing adaptations continue to emerge as organisms interact with their changing surroundings (N/A). The intricacies of these adaptations highlight the resilience and versatility inherent in cold-climate species. The image illustrating boreal forest distribution further emphasizes this ecological complexity .
| Species | Adaptations | Habitat | Average Temperature (°F) | Range |
| Boreal Spruce | Flexible branches, conical shape to shed snow | Boreal forests (Taiga) | -10 to 30 | Northeast Asia, Canada, Northern Europe |
| Lynx | Thick fur for insulation, large paws for snow travel | Boreal forests, tundra regions | -20 to 20 | North America, Europe, Asia |
| Snowshoe Hare | Seasonal color change (brown to white), large feet for walking on snow | Boreal and temperate forests | 0 to 40 | North America, parts of Asia |
| Moose | Thick fur, ability to forage under snow | Temperate and boreal forests | -20 to 60 | North America, Europe, Asia |
| Arctic Fox | Thick fur coat, fat reserves for insulation, color change with seasons | Arctic tundra regions | -40 to 30 | Arctic regions of North America and Eurasia |
Species Adaptations in Cold Forest Biomes
C. Examples: Siberian Taiga, Canadian Boreal Forest
The Siberian Taiga and the Canadian Boreal Forest epitomize the characteristics of boreal biomes, showcasing their resilience and ecological significance in a warming climate. These forests, primarily composed of coniferous trees such as spruce and fir, dominate vast regions of Russia and Canada, adapting to harsh climates with long winters and short summers. The structural complexity within these forests, influenced by abiotic factors like soil composition and temperature variations, fosters diverse habitats that are crucial for numerous species (Shvidenko et al.). Furthermore, these forests play a pivotal role in carbon storage, significantly mitigating climate change impacts. As anthropogenic pressures increase, understanding the dynamics of these ecosystems becomes essential for conservation and management strategies (Fischer et al.). The depiction of boreal forest distributions and characteristics in the image illustrates their geographical significance, enhancing our comprehension of these vital ecological regions.
| Forest Type | Area Covered km2 | Average Temperature Celsius | Annual Precipitation mm | Dominant Tree Species | Biodiversity Index |
| Siberian Taiga | 1150000 | -5 | 400 | Spruce, Pine, Larch | 6.5 |
| Canadian Boreal Forest | 1300000 | -3 | 600 | Pine, Spruce, Birch | 7 |
Forest Biome Characteristics and Statistics
V. Comparative Analysis of Forest Types
A comparative analysis of forest types reveals distinct ecological roles and responses to climate change across tropical, temperate, and boreal biomes. Tropical forests, characterized by high biodiversity and productivity, play a crucial role in carbon sequestration and the regulation of global temperatures, which is underscored by findings linking soil respiration rates (RS) to temperature sensitivity across latitudinal gradients, with tropical ecosystems exhibiting a Q10 value of 2.33 ±0.01 ((Makarieva A et al.)). In contrast, temperate forests, while also significant carbon sinks, experience more pronounced seasonal variations, influencing their ecosystem services, as indicated by wealth estimates relating to wood, recreational use, and carbon stocks ((Chiabai A et al.)). Boreal forests, often deemed carbon reservoirs, display unique dynamics tied to permafrost and climatic shifts, thus highlighting the interconnectedness of these biomes. This intricate web of ecological interactions emphasizes the need to understand each forest types unique contributions and vulnerabilities.
| Forest Type | Location | Average Temperature (°C) | Annual Rainfall (mm) | Biodiversity Level | Carbon Sequestration Potential (tCO2/ha/year) |
| Tropical | Near the equator | 20-30 | 1750-2000 | Very High | 10-20 |
| Temperate | Mid-latitudes | 0-20 | 750-1500 | Moderate | 5-15 |
| Boreal | High latitudes | -5 to 10 | 300-850 | Low to Moderate | 5-10 |
Comparative Analysis of Forest Types
A. Biodiversity Differences Among Forest Types
The disparities in biodiversity among tropical, temperate, and boreal forests underscore the unique ecological functions these biomes serve. Tropical forests, with their warm climate and abundant rainfall, boast the highest levels of biodiversity, hosting approximately half of the Earth’s species despite only covering a small fraction of the planets land area. In contrast, temperate forests exhibit moderate biodiversity, characterized by diverse tree species and a rich understory, while boreal forests, although expansive, primarily consist of coniferous species and have lower species richness. Notably, the persistence of these biodiversity patterns can be linked to ecosystem services and economic valuation of forest types. According to recent studies, boreal and warm mixed forests show significant potential economic losses tied to their biodiversity, estimated at €78 billion by the year 2050, highlighting the urgent need for conservation ((A Markandya et al.), (Chiabai A et al.)). These findings reinforce the necessity of tailored management practices that recognize the distinct ecological roles of each forest type.
| Forest Type | Species Diversity Index | Endemic Species | Total Tree Species | Average Biomass Ton per Hectare |
| Tropical | 1000 | 16000 | 3000 | 150 |
| Temperate | 300 | 2000 | 600 | 100 |
| Boreal | 150 | 200 | 50 | 80 |
Biodiversity Metrics of Forest Types
B. Human Impacts on Each Forest Type
Human activities have profoundly affected each forest type—tropical, temperate, and boreal—leading to significant ecological consequences. In tropical forests, rapid deforestation driven by agriculture, logging, and urbanization has resulted in habitat loss and diminished biodiversity, threatening countless species. Conversely, temperate forests face challenges from commercial logging and suburban sprawl, which disrupt local ecosystems and compromise soil health. Boreal forests, often overlooked, are also experiencing detrimental effects due to climate change, exacerbated by industrial activities such as mining and oil extraction. These impacts not only alter the physical landscapes but also affect carbon storage and local climate regulation, underscoring the complexities of human-environment interactions. The continued degradation of these forest types highlights the urgent need for sustainable management practices to mitigate human impacts. An illustrative example of these dynamics can be seen in the image referenced.
The chart illustrates the impact of various human activities on different forest types, focusing on deforestation rates, climate change impact levels, and urgency for management. It highlights that tropical forests experience the highest deforestation rate and the greatest urgency for management. Temperate forests show significant but lesser impacts, while boreal forests have the lowest ratings in both deforestation and management urgency.
REFERENCES
- A. Markandya, Aline Chiabai, C. M. Travisi, H. Ding, P.A.L.D Nunes. “Economic Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services: Methodology and Monetary Estimates”. 2025, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6300537.pdf
- Fischer, G., Stolbovoi, V., van Minnen, J.G.. “A Land-Cover Classification for Modeling Natural Land Cover within the IIASA LUC Project”. WP-96-026, 1996, https://core.ac.uk/download/33896470.pdf
- Gagnon, Jennifer. “A Global Conservation Assessment of Temperate Forests: Status and Protection”. ScholarWorks@UNO, 2003, https://core.ac.uk/download/216834968.pdf
- Cantalapiedra, Juan L., Gamboa, Sara, Hernández Fernández, Manuel, Menéndez, et al.. “Phylogenetic biome conservatism as a key concept for an integrative understanding of evolutionary history: Galliformes and Falconiformes as study cases”. Oxford University Press, 2022, https://core.ac.uk/download/580451292.pdf
- Gillespie, Alexander. “From the Galalpagos to Tongariro: Recognizing and saving the most important places in the world”. Resource Management Law Association of New Zealand, 2009, https://core.ac.uk/download/29196164.pdf
- Chomitz, Kenneth M., Douglas, Ellen M., Sebastian, Kate, Vorosmarty, et al.. “The role of tropical forests in supporting biodiversity and hydrological integrity: a synoptic overview”. 2025, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6372773.pdf
- AM Makarieva, B Bond-Lamberty, B Bond-Lamberty, B Bond-Lamberty, CD Koven, CE Hicks Pries, CJ Mikan, et al.. “The influence of soil communities on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration”. ‘Springer Science and Business Media LLC’, 2018, https://core.ac.uk/download/160748912.pdf
- Aline Chiabai, Anil Markandya, Chiara Travisi, Helen Ding, Paulo Nunes. “Economic Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services Losses: Cost of Policy Inaction”. 2025, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6294123.pdf
- Minnen, J.G. van, Sitch, S.. “Incorporating Natural Vegetation into the LUC Project Framework”. WP-96-112, 1996, https://core.ac.uk/download/33896385.pdf
- Wang, Jonathan Alexander. “Interactions among land cover, disturbance, and productivity across Arctic-Boreal ecosystems of Northwestern North America from remote sensing”. 2020, https://core.ac.uk/download/289166785.pdf
- I. Bukharina, A. Konôpková, K. Vedernikov, O. Svetlakova, A. Pashkova. “The State of the Spruce Stands of the Boreal and Boreal Subboreal Forests of the Eastern European Plain in the Territory of the Udmurt Republic (Russia)”. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2020, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/788ade94c8f5bf9dd8ffb1aa18527906f3ec5bdd
- R. Nestby, T. Krogstad, K. Hovstad. “Botanical survey of two Norwegian forest fields, dominated by European blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.)”. 2017, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83e00d78d825acccf44f198c3e7c17597fcecd1b
- Philippe Ciais, Vincent Gitz. “Amplifying effects of land-use change on future atmospheric CO2 levels”. 2025, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7308659.pdf
- Shvidenko, A.Z., Steffen, W.. “IGBP Northern Eurasia Study: Prospectus for an Integrated Global Change Research Project”. IGBP Global Change Report No. 37, 1996, https://core.ac.uk/download/33896269.pdf
- Ashton, Mark S., Gentry, Bradford, Spalding, Deborah, Tyrrell, et al.. “Forests and Carbon: A Synthesis of Science, Management, and Policy for Carbon Sequestration in Forests”. EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale, 2009, https://core.ac.uk/download/232776329.pdf
- Austin, Beau J., Brondizio, Eduardo S., Burgess, Neil D., Duncan, et al.. “Importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for the conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes”. 2020, https://core.ac.uk/download/328854586.pdf
- Paul R. Elsen, Earl C. Saxon, B. Alexander Simmons, Michelle Ward, Brooke Williams, Hedley S. Grantham, Salit Kark, et al.. “Accelerated shifts in terrestrial life zones under rapid climate change”. Global Change Biology, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15962
- Tomáš Větrovský, Petr Kohout, Martin Kopecký, Antonín Macháč, Matěj Man, Barbara Doreen Bahnmann, Vendula Brabcová, et al.. “A meta-analysis of global fungal distribution reveals climate-driven patterns”. Nature Communications, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13164-8
- Guido R. van der Werf, James T. Randerson, Louis Giglio, T. T. van Leeuwen, Yang Chen, Brendan M. Rogers, M. Mu, et al.. “Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016”. Earth system science data, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017
- Natalia Pérez Harguindeguy, Sandra Dı́az, Éric Garnier, Sandra Lavorel, Hendrik Poorter, Pedro Jaureguiberry, M. Syndonia Bret‐Harte, et al.. “New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide”. Australian Journal of Botany, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1071/bt12225
Image References:
- “Comparative Analysis of Climate Control Functions in Tropical, Temperate, and Boreal Forests.” storage.googleapis.com, 25 January 2025, https://storage.googleapis.com/jnl-su-j-tbcpm-files/journals/1/articles/34/submission/proof/34-10-111-1-17-20220325.png