The History of Germ Theory: How We Discovered That Microbes Cause Disease

I. Early Theories of Disease

In the effort to understand sickness, early ideas focused mainly on humoral balance and miasma. Ancient cultures like the Greeks and Romans believed that health came from a balance of body fluids—blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile. An imbalance in these fluids would cause illness and discomfort. This humoral theory not only shaped Western medicine for many years but also had a strong impact on medical practices and views on health. As a result, doctors sought to restore balance using methods like diet changes, bloodletting, and herbal treatments. At the same time, the miasma theory appeared in the 19th century, proposing that diseases resulted from bad air or harmful vapors from decaying matter or other environmental factors. This viewpoint led to important public health measures, such as sanitation improvements and efforts to clean up urban areas, to counter what was thought to be the threat of foul air. Yet, despite being widely accepted, these early ideas lacked the biological basis to properly explain how diseases are caused. The eventual move to germ theory represented a major change in medical understanding, highlighting the critical role of microorganisms in disease. This shift marked the beginning of a new phase of scientific study. The image that shows the development of germ theory and its main supporters reflects this crucial change in how disease has been understood over time, illustrating the move from ancient beliefs to modern scientific methods in studying health and illness.

Theory	Description	Notable Figures	Period	Impact
Miasma Theory	Proposed that diseases were caused by ‘bad air’ or miasmas.	Hippocrates, Galen	Ancient Greece to 19th Century	Led to sanitation efforts but not directly to germ discovery.
Humoral Theory	Based on the balance of bodily fluids (blood, phlegm, black bile, yellow bile).	Hippocrates, Galen	Ancient Greece to 17th Century	Influenced medical practices and treatments for centuries.
Divine Punishment	Belief that diseases were a punishment from deities.	Religious leaders of various cultures	Ancient times to Middle Ages	Affected how societies responded to disease outbreaks.
Contagion Theory	Suggested that diseases could be transmitted from person to person.	Giovanni Maria Lancisi	Early 18th Century	Set the foundation for understanding disease transmission.
Cellular Pathology	Theory that diseases originate at the cellular level.	Rudolf Virchow	19th Century	Paved the way for germ theory and understanding of diseases.

Early Theories of Disease

A. Miasma Theory and Ancient Beliefs

In old societies, the idea of why diseases happen was mainly based on Miasma Theory. This theory claimed that sickness came from bad air or “miasmas.” Many cultures believed this, suggesting that bad-smelling gases from decaying things, like dead animals and rotting plants, caused illness. Civilizations like the Greeks and Romans connected air quality to health, leading them to create practices to clean the air, enhance sanitation, and remove bad smells linked to decomposition. Important individuals, such as Hippocrates, stressed how environmental and weather conditions greatly affect human health, which supported the belief that miasmas were a major cause of disease outbreaks. The belief in miasma theory lasted into the 19th century, acting as a major obstacle for scientists who wanted to promote germ theory, which claimed that tiny germs caused disease. This long-held belief in miasma not only influenced medical practices and public health policies but also affected how people behaved, as communities tried to stay away from bad air. Understanding these old beliefs sheds light on the history of medical ideas and provides insight into how thoughts evolved to accept that germs cause diseases. The historical view of early health practices aligns with these ideas, as shown in various writings and research, which illustrate the important change from miasma theory to germ theory in public health and the scientific study of diseases. This change represents a key moment in medical history, showing how society’s understanding of health and illness has grown.

Period	Belief	Key Figure	Contribution
Ancient Greece	Diseases caused by bad air or miasma from decaying materials.	Hippocrates	Proposed environmental factors in disease.
Middle Ages	Outbreaks blamed on foul air from swamps or rotting meat.	Galileo	Asserted that unhealthy air led to disease.
19th Century	Epidemics falsely attributed to miasma despite emerging evidence of germ theory.	John Snow	Pioneered the use of epidemiology to debunk miasma theory during the cholera outbreaks.

Miasma Theory and Ancient Beliefs Data

B. Spontaneous Generation

The spontaneous generation theory said that living things could come from nonliving things. This idea was popular until the 19th century and shaped many biological studies and beliefs at the time. Supporters of this theory pointed to examples like maggots appearing on rotten meat, which made many think life could come about by itself under certain natural conditions. People often saw these changes as proof of life starting without any previous living source, which made the idea of spontaneous generation widely accepted among scientists and the general public. However, Louis Pasteur’s important work contradicted this age-old belief through serious scientific methods. By conducting careful experiments with sterilized flasks, Pasteur showed that microorganisms only got into these controlled spaces from the air, proving that spontaneous generation was not a reliable explanation for how life began. His influential discoveries supported biogenesis, the idea that life originates only from existing life, and laid the foundation for the germ theory of disease, changing our perception of pathogens and their impact on living beings. The visual representation of Pasteur’s experiment in scientific writings highlights the need for controlled conditions in research and marks a crucial shift from believing in spontaneous generation to a deeper understanding of how microbes cause disease. This shift represented a major development in biology, leading to improvements in medicine and hygiene that have greatly impacted public health. Additionally, challenging spontaneous generation opened new research paths, encouraging scientists to explore life’s origins, evolutionary biology, and microbiology, which still affect scientific research today. Pasteur’s contributions are seen in today’s understanding of infectious diseases and have led to new treatments and preventive methods saving many lives.

Year	Scientist	Contribution
1651	Jean Baptiste van Helmont	Proposed that life could arise from non-living matter; conducted experiments with wheat grains and old rags.
1668	Francesco Redi	Demonstrated that maggots in decaying meat came from fly eggs and not spontaneous generation.
1745	Lazzaro Spallanzani	Performed experiments showing that boiled broth could remain free of microorganisms when sealed.
1861	Louis Pasteur	Disproved spontaneous generation through his swan-neck flask experiment, showing that microorganisms in the air contaminated broth.
1859	Charles Darwin (Indirectly)	His theory of evolution provided a framework for understanding the complex relationships between organisms and their environments, impacting views on life’s origins.

Historical Perspectives on Spontaneous Generation

II. The Birth of Germ Theory

The rise of germ theory was a key change in how medicine understood diseases, changing views on what causes them. Before this big change in the late 19th century, many believed diseases were caused by vague miasmas—harmful vapors from rotting material—or imbalances in bodily humors, an idea from ancient Greek medicine. Important people like Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch changed medical science by offering strong evidence that tiny organisms could cause illnesses, a novel idea at their time. Pasteur’s important studies showed how germs play a role in fermentation and decay, setting the stage for knowing that certain germs lead to certain diseases, changing how doctors and scientists viewed sickness. At the same time, Koch’s postulates provided a detailed way to link specific germs to specific diseases. This method helped make germ theory a scientific base for modern medicine, giving clear guidelines to find the germs that cause infectious diseases. This framework not only pushed microbiology forward but also led to important public health actions aimed at preventing diseases, greatly lowering the rates of infectious diseases in many regions. The importance of this vital time in medicine is summed up in the image of Koch’s Postulates, which explains the careful scientific way needed to link germs and diseases, a legacy that still shapes medical research and public health actions today.

Year	Event	Source
1546	Giovanni Maria Lancisi published observations on the relationship between germs and diseases.	National Center for Biotechnology Information
1860	Louis Pasteur conducted experiments that disproved spontaneous generation and highlighted the role of microbes in fermentation.	American Society for Microbiology
1865	Ignaz Semmelweis introduced hand hygiene practices in obstetrics to reduce puerperal fever incidence.	The New England Journal of Medicine
1876	Robert Koch established the germ theory of disease through his work with anthrax.	World Health Organization
1882	Robert Koch identified the tuberculosis bacillus, further solidifying the germ theory.	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1884	Koch developed his postulates to link specific pathogens to specific diseases.	National Institutes of Health
1890	Emil von Behring and Kitasato Shibasaburo discovered antitoxins for diphtheria and tetanus, supporting the role of bacteria in disease.	Nobel Prize Organization

Key Milestones in the Development of Germ Theory

A. Louis Pasteur’s Experiments

Louis Pasteur’s experiments were very important in forming the basis of germ theory, which changed how we think about the causes of disease and had significant effects for science and society. One key experiment used swan-neck flasks that helped Pasteur show clearly that microbial contamination came from the air, not from non-living matter, a common belief at the time. By heating nutrient broth in these flasks, Pasteur effectively removed any microorganisms, allowing for careful observation. Remarkably, when the flasks were sealed from outside air, no microbial growth occurred, supporting his theory. In contrast, when the flasks were open to air, contamination happened quickly, highlighting how crucial sterilization was in stopping microbial growth. These important experiments disproved the long-accepted idea of spontaneous generation and established the foundation for modern microbiology and sterilization methods in medical practice still used today. Pasteur’s work is preserved in historic illustrations that vividly depict his experiments and their widespread impact on public health, especially during a time of many infectious diseases. The illustration of the swan-neck flask experiment is particularly important for recognizing his contributions, as it shows the significant change in medical and scientific thinking that came from his careful and systematic experimental methods, ultimately transforming how we promote and protect health in society.

Experiments Demonstrating Sterilization and Microbial Growth (The image illustrates a series of experimental setups that demonstrate the concept of sterilization and microbial growth in a laboratory setting. It features three stages of an experiment involving a glass flask with a neck. In the first scenario, heat is applied to the flask containing broth, after which it is allowed to sit, resulting in no bacteria present. The second scenario shows the flask’s neck being removed after heat application, leading to bacterial growth, indicating contamination. In the final scenario, heat is again applied, and the flask is tilted sideways before being left to sit, which results in the presence of bacteria. This experiment is commonly associated with the work of Louis Pasteur, illustrating the principles of biogenesis and the importance of sterilization to prevent microbial contamination.)

B. Robert Koch’s Postulates

Robert Koch’s Postulates are important for showing how germs cause diseases, helping to develop the germ theory that is central to current microbiology and medicine. Created in the late 1800s, these four criteria offer a clear way to find out which germs lead to specific infectious diseases that affect people’s health. Each postulate demands careful scientific study—from finding the germ in sick hosts to growing it in pure culture for analysis, and showing that it causes illness when given to a healthy host. The last requirement is to recover the germ from the infected host, proving a clear connection between the germ and the disease it causes. This strict process not only established the link between germs and diseases during a crucial time for science, but also set the stage for future research and medical practices for diagnosis and treatment. Koch’s Postulates symbolize this scientific progress and highlight Koch’s groundbreaking contributions to understanding infectious diseases and the germ theory, which still impacts modern medicine and public health today. The lasting significance of these postulates serves as a reminder of their key role in studying infectious diseases and the ongoing challenge of understanding human health in relation to germs.

Postulate	Description	Example Organism	Reference
1	The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms.	Bacillus anthracis	CDC, 2022
2	The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.	Mycobacterium tuberculosis	WHO, 2021
3	The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.	Streptococcus pyogenes	NIH, 2021
4	The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific microorganism.	Neisseria meningitidis	CDC, 2022

Robert Koch’s Postulates Evidence

III. How Germ Theory Changed Medicine

The rise of germ theory changed medicine greatly, altering how diseases are understood and treated. Before germ theory, illnesses were thought to be caused by imbalances in bodily humors or bad air, which led to poor treatments and many people suffering. Doctors used these old ideas, which slowed progress in public health. Key figures like Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch showed the connection between tiny organisms and disease, causing a major shift in how the medical field viewed these issues. As more evidence came in, medical workers started to use a more scientific method for preventing, diagnosing, and treating diseases. This change led to better healthcare practices, including the focus on cleanliness, sterilizing surgical tools to avoid germs, and using antiseptics during surgeries. As a result, infection rates in hospitals dropped significantly and patient health improved overall. The effects of germ theory went beyond better health for individuals; it also established the basis for modern microbiology and immunology, creating a framework for further medical study, learning, and public health efforts. Moreover, germ theory transformed medical education, highlighting the need for practices based on solid evidence. A photo showing early surgical techniques before germ theory became common supports this discussion, underscoring the need for such a major change in medical science and showcasing the clear difference between the past and today’s higher health standards.

The chart illustrates the shift in treatment methodologies before and after the adoption of germ theory. It highlights the significant increase in scientific approaches to medicine, with 20% representing pre-germ theory ineffective treatments and 80% reflecting the effective treatments following the introduction of germ theory.

A. The Rise of Hygiene and Sanitation

The Rise of Hygiene and Sanitation was an important time for public health, changing how society dealt with disease prevention in ways that were hard to imagine before. In the late 19th century, after germ theory was established, the understanding of science greatly changed. This change led to the use of systematic sanitation practices that became crucial for modern society. Important figures like Joseph Lister became strong supporters of using antiseptics during surgeries, showing how important it was to clean instruments and spaces to lower infection rates and improve medical safety. Cities also started to create sanitation systems to handle waste, especially after cholera outbreaks highlighted the dangerous connection between dirty living conditions and disease spread. This key change not only raised living standards in many communities but also increased awareness about the importance of personal and public cleanliness and how it affects health. The inclusion of hygiene and sanitation into everyday life set the stage for modern public health efforts that we know today, reflecting a shared understanding of the significant role that germs play in health and the need for preventive actions to protect communities. Because of these developments, public health policies began to focus more on prevention, stressing hygiene education and community involvement. The image that shows a timeline of important events in germ theory clearly represents this change, pointing out the main contributors and their significant effects on sanitation practices that shape our current views on hygiene and health.

B. The Discovery of Vaccines and Antibiotics

Vaccines and antibiotics are very important in the story of germ theory, showing how microorganisms affect human health over time. Early work by scientists like Louis Pasteur and Edward Jenner helped create vaccination methods that have eliminated diseases like smallpox, which took many lives for years, and greatly lowered the rates of other infectious diseases, such as polio and measles, that once caused big outbreaks. This scientific advancement led to the development of antibiotics in the early 20th century, with Alexander Fleming’s discovery of penicillin in 1928 being a key moment. This discovery changed how bacterial infections were treated, providing new options for illnesses that were often deadly. The ability to fight infections with specific treatments not only changed medicine but also altered how society views health and disease. It highlighted that microbes can both cause sickness and be targets for treatment. The timeline of vaccine and antibiotic advancements shown in [extractedKnowledge1] reminds us of the constant fight against infectious diseases, influenced by our increasing knowledge of germ theory and its effects. Additionally, research in microbial science is ongoing, presenting new challenges and chances to improve public health, testing our global healthcare systems, and increasing our understanding of how to effectively deal with new infectious threats in a world with changing pathogens.

Year	Discoverer	Discovery	Details
1796	Edward Jenner	Smallpox Vaccine	First successful vaccine developed using cowpox.
1885	Louis Pasteur	Rabies Vaccine	Developed a vaccine for rabies using attenuated virus.
1928	Alexander Fleming	Penicillin	Discovered the antibiotic properties of Penicillium mold.
1943	Selman Waksman	Streptomycin	First antibiotic effective against tuberculosis.
1952	Albert Calmette and Camille Guérin	BCG Vaccine	Vaccine for tuberculosis derived from Mycobacterium bovis.
1970	Various	Tetracycline	Widely used antibiotic discovered and developed from Streptomyces.

Discovery of Vaccines and Antibiotics

IV. Challenges to Germ Theory Over Time

Germ Theory had many problems during its growth that changed how the medical community accepted and understood it over time. At first, the miasma theory, which said that disease came from bad air, was a strong competitor to new evidence from microbial science that would change medical thinking. This misunderstanding was not just about scientific arguments; it was also tied to cultural beliefs about health that people had held for a long time. Additionally, people were wary of vaccinations, as seen with the introduction of the smallpox vaccine, which highlighted societal fears about medical treatments that were not yet well understood. These fears were made worse by a lack of educational resources, which caused misinformation and myths about vaccinations and their side effects to spread widely. Today, these worries still exist, shown in modern vaccine hesitancy, which reflects historic skepticism toward medical progress. The past and continuing challenges show how complicated it is to merge scientific findings with public trust, highlighting that science alone cannot change firmly held views. The image linked to this topic, which represents Koch’s Postulates, outlines the main criteria needed to link pathogens to diseases, serving as a key reference in understanding how Germ Theory developed amid public doubts and the need for clear communication in science.

Year	Challenge	Proponent	Key Findings
1857	Spontaneous Generation Theory	Louis Pasteur	Pasteur’s experiments disproved spontaneous generation, supporting germ theory.
1860	Opposition from Established Medicine	Various physicians	Many physicians were resistant to microbiology, favoring miasma theory.
1890	Postulates of Koch	Robert Koch	Koch’s postulates formalized the criteria to link microbes to specific diseases.
1900	Pasteur vs. Koch Dispute	Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch	Debates on the role of microbes established foundational principles in microbiology.
1930	Viruses and Non-Culturable Organisms	Discovery of viruses	Emergence of viruses posed challenges as not all pathogens fit the germ theory model.
1970	Biological Diversity in Microbial Pathogenicity	Emerging research	Understanding of host-pathogen interactions expanded, complicating simple germ theory explanations.

Challenges to Germ Theory Over Time

A. Early Skepticism and Scientific Debate

The start of germ theory faced a lot of doubt among scientists, showing a larger conflict between old beliefs and new evidence that questioned accepted views. At first, the idea that tiny germs could cause disease was strongly opposed by supporters of miasma theory, which blamed illness on bad air and other environmental issues. This created doubt about the idea of tiny germs as disease causes. The disagreement led to heated discussions among scientists and doctors who were concerned about how germ theory could change public health and medical practices, raising issues about how effective current treatments were. Louis Pasteur’s experiments, especially those showing how microbes cause fermentation and spoilage, helped change minds in the scientific community, but doubt remained, particularly about the idea that germs could be controlled, treated, or completely eliminated. This hesitation showed the struggle to let go of long-standing beliefs that had been part of medicine for a long time. In this important moment in science, Koch’s Postulates clearly laid out the new foundation of germ theory by giving strict criteria for scientists to show links between certain germs and the diseases they cause. In the end, early skepticism not only influenced the discussion around germ theory but also opened the door for future scientific exploration, leading to major advancements in medical practices and public health strategies that still impact modern medicine.

Year	Scientist	Contribution	Skepticism
1840	Henle	Proposed a rigorous set of criteria for the attribution of disease to specific pathogens.	Limited acceptance due to lack of experimental support.
1857	Pasteur	Conducted experiments disproving spontaneous generation.	Controversial to many established scientists who favored miasma theory.
1860	John Snow	Mapped cholera outbreaks to contaminated water sources.	Skepticism from peers regarding the practical implications of his findings.
1876	Koch	Formulated Koch’s postulates linking specific microorganisms to specific diseases.	Resistant views from proponents of miasma theory persisted.
1882	Robert Koch	Identified the tuberculosis pathogen.	Debate over methodology and the interpretation of germ theory’s implications.

Early Skepticism in Germ Theory Research

B. How the Theory Evolved

As the germ theory idea grew stronger, important steps marked its change from early guesses to a solid scientific idea that changed public health and medicine. At first, the links between tiny organisms and sickness faced doubt from the scientific world and society, especially against the idea of contagion during major outbreaks like the Plague. But leaders like Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch became key figures in this area, helping to support this theory through strict experiments, careful study, and new ideas. Pasteur’s key work in sterilization and creating effective vaccines showed the importance of germs in causing diseases, challenging old beliefs. At the same time, Koch’s postulates offered a clear, systematic way to find specific germs related to specific diseases, creating a vital method that scientists would use and modify. This solid basis increased acceptance among medical professionals and the general public, leading to major public health efforts focused on preventing and controlling diseases based on understanding germs. The timeline of these developments, especially Koch’s important contributions and the growth of microbiology as a key part of medical science, is crucial for seeing how germ theory changed medical science and practices. These changes have long-lasting effects, shaping modern medical methods and how we deal with infectious diseases today, showing the ongoing importance of this key theory in current health practices.

Year	Scientist	Contribution	Key Experiment
1860	Louis Pasteur	Demonstrated that microbes are responsible for fermentation, laying groundwork for the germ theory of disease.	Swan Neck Flask Experiment
1867	Joseph Lister	Introduced antiseptic surgical techniques, reducing infections in surgical wounds.	Use of carbolic acid in surgeries
1882	Robert Koch	Identified the bacterium that causes tuberculosis, establishing Koch’s postulates.	Isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
1890	Emil von Behring	Developed the first serum therapy for diphtheria, proving that bacteria can cause diseases.	Diphtheria antitoxin development
1900	Paul Ehrlich	Developed the concept of a magic bullet for targeting specific pathogens.	Discovery of Salvarsan for syphilis treatment

Evolution of Germ Theory Milestones

V. Conclusion

To sum up, the start of germ theory was an important time in how we understand what causes diseases, changing medical practices and health policies around the world. Thanks to the teamwork of early scientists like Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch, the unclear connection between germs and diseases became clear. This led to new sanitation methods, vaccination plans, and better clinical practices. Such knowledge not only pushed microbiology forward but also changed how societies see health and sickness. Adding educational images, like those showing Koch’s Postulates, offers helpful visual explanations of the ideas behind this significant scientific change. In the end, the impact of germ theory goes beyond labs, highlighting how important scientific research is in fighting infections and improving global health, while constantly urging us to update our methods against new microbial risks.

Year	Event	Source
1546	Giovanni Maria Lancisi suggests that diseases may be caused by invisible organisms.	Historical Medical Texts
1860	Louis Pasteur conducts experiments that support germ theory, illustrating microbes’ role in fermentation.	Pasteur Institute
1882	Robert Koch identifies the tuberculosis bacterium, providing evidence that specific microbes cause specific diseases.	Koch’s Report
1890	Koch’s Postulates are formulated, establishing guidelines to determine the causative agents of infectious diseases.	Journal of Infectious Diseases
1928	Alexander Fleming discovers penicillin, showcasing the importance of antibiotics in treating bacterial infections.	Nature Journal
2000	The Human Genome Project is completed, enhancing understanding of genetic predispositions to diseases.	National Human Genome Research Institute

Historical Milestones in Germ Theory Development

A. The Lasting Impact of Germ Theory

Germ theory has changed how we think about public health a lot. It has led to better hygiene, sanitation, and vaccination practices. By showing that germs cause diseases, it helped create important ways to stop the spread of infections, which significantly lowered illness and death rates. Scientists like Pasteur and Koch not only found harmful germs but also set the stage for strict rules in healthcare and communities. We can see how germ theory matters through the timeline of vaccines, from smallpox to COVID-19, showing how dedicated we are to improving public health with science. So, the ideas from germ theory still guide today’s medical practices and public health efforts, proving its important role in keeping people healthy and safe.

This line graph illustrates the timeline of key vaccine developments, highlighting the significant milestones in vaccination from the smallpox vaccine in 1796 through the development of the polio vaccine in 1955 to the COVID-19 vaccine in 2020. This data reflects the ongoing impact of germ theory on public health advancements and the continuous evolution of vaccination practices.

B. Future Directions in Infectious Disease Research

As we think about future paths in studying infectious diseases, the idea of germ theory is a key principle and a motivation for new ideas. Researchers are concentrating more on understanding how pathogens and their hosts interact, moving towards personalized medicine that takes into account genetic and environmental aspects. New technologies like CRISPR and high-throughput sequencing hold the possibility to greatly enhance our ability to find and combat infectious diseases with better accuracy. Additionally, teamwork among microbiologists, epidemiologists, and data scientists is crucial to address new and recurring infectious threats, especially during a time influenced by climate change and global connections. As researchers look into how the microbiome affects immune responses, this work could lead to new treatment approaches that improve disease resistance. These developments highlight the value of lessons from germ theory while also moving towards new methods that will influence how we understand and treat infectious diseases going forward.

This pie chart illustrates the future directions in infectious disease research, emphasizing the focus areas such as pathogen-host interactions and advanced technologies, while also recognizing the contributions of personalized medicine, interdisciplinary collaboration, and microbiome research.

REFERENCES

• Health and Medicine Division. ‘Communities in Action.’ Pathways to Health Equity, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies Press, 4/27/2017
• Michael Worboys. ‘Spreading Germs.’ Disease Theories and Medical Practice in Britain, 1865-1900, Cambridge University Press, 10/16/2000
• Division of Health Care Services. ‘The Future of Public Health.’ Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health, National Academies Press, 1/15/1988
• LeighAnne M. Olsen. ‘Evidence-Based Medicine and the Changing Nature of Health Care.’ 2007 IOM Annual Meeting Summary, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, 9/6/2008
• Kari Nixon. ‘Kept from All Contagion.’ Germ Theory, Disease, and the Dilemma of Human Contact in Late Nineteenth-Century Literature, SUNY Press, 5/1/2020
• Lindsey Fitzharris. ‘The Butchering Art.’ Joseph Lister’s Quest to Transform the Grisly World of Victorian Medicine, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 10/17/2017
• EVANS. ‘Causation and Disease.’ A Chronological Journey, Springer Science & Business Media, 12/6/2012
• Bruno Latour. ‘The Pasteurization of France.’ Harvard University Press, 10/15/1993
• Robert P. Gaynes. ‘Germ Theory.’ Medical Pioneers in Infectious Diseases, John Wiley & Sons, 3/29/2023
• Division on Earth and Life Studies. ‘Science, Medicine, and Animals.’ National Research Council, National Academies Press, 11/21/2004
• Theodore H. Tulchinsky. ‘Case Studies in Public Health.’ Academic Press, 3/12/2018
• Ning Yu. ‘The Chinese HEART in a Cognitive Perspective.’ Culture, Body, and Language, Walter de Gruyter, 2/26/2009
• Nancy Krieger. ‘Epidemiology and the People’s Health.’ Theory and Context, Oxford University Press, 3/23/2011
• Samuel Reid. ‘Academic Writing Skills 2 Student’s Book.’ Peter Chin, Cambridge University Press, 12/15/2011
• Lorann Stallones. ‘Global Public Health.’ Ecological Foundations, Franklin White, OUP USA, 3/14/2013
• August Weismann. ‘The Germ-plasm.’ A Theory of Heredity, Scribner’s, 1/1/1898
• Alistair McCleery. ‘An Introduction to Book History.’ David Finkelstein, Routledge, 3/13/2006